We report observations of the Cabibbo suppressed decays B-->D((*))K- using a 10.4 fb(-1) data sample accumulated at the Upsilon(4S) resonance with the Belle detector at the KEKB e(+)e(-) storage ring. We find that the ratios of Cabibbo suppressed to Cabibbo favored branching fractions are B(B--->D0K-)/B(B--->D0pi(-)) = 0.079+/-0.009+/-0.006, B(B(0)-->D+K-)/B(B(0)-->D+pi(-)) = 0.068+/-0.015+/-0.007, B(B--->D(*0)K-)/B(B--->D(*0)pi(-)) = 0.078+/-0.019+/-0.009, and B(B(0)-->D(*+)K-)/B(B(0)-->D(*+)pi(-)) = 0.074+/-0.015+/-0.006. These are the first observations of the B-->D+K-, D(*0)K-, and D(*+)K- decay processes.
We report the observation of a narrow charmoniumlike state produced in the exclusive decay process B+/--->K+/-pi(+)pi(-)J/psi. This state, which decays into pi(+)pi(-)J/psi, has a mass of 3872.0+/-0.6(stat)+/-0.5(syst) MeV, a value that is very near the M(D0)+M(D(*0)) mass threshold. The results are based on an analysis of 152M B-Bmacr; events collected at the Upsilon(4S) resonance in the Belle detector at the KEKB collider. The signal has a statistical significance that is in excess of 10sigma.
We tabulate the atomic mass excesses and binding energies, ground-state
shell-plus-pairing corrections, ground-state microscopic corrections, and
nuclear ground-state deformations of 9318 nuclei ranging from $^{16}$O to
$A=339$. The calculations are based on the finite-range droplet macroscopic
model and the folded-Yukawa single-particle microscopic model. Relative to our
FRDM(1992) mass table in {\sc Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables} [{\bf 59}
185 (1995)], the results are obtained in the same model, but with considerably
improved treatment of deformation and fewer of the approximations that were
necessary earlier, due to limitations in computer power. The more accurate
execution of the model and the more extensive and more accurate experimental
mass data base now available allows us to determine one additional
macroscopic-model parameter, the density-symmetry coefficient $L$, which was
not varied in the previous calculation, but set to zero. Because we now realize
that the FRDM is inaccurate for some highly deformed shapes occurring in
fission, because some effects are derived in terms of perturbations around a
sphere, we only adjust its macroscopic parameters to ground-state masses. The
values of ten constants are determined directly from an optimization to fit
ground-state masses of 2149 nuclei ranging from $^{16}$O to $^{265}_{106}$Sg
and $^{264}_{108}$Hs. The error of the mass model is 0.5595~MeV. We also
provide masses in the FRLDM, which in the more accurate treatments now has an
error of 0.6618 MeV. But in contrast to the FRDM, it is suitable for studies of
fission and has been extensively so applied elsewhere, with FRLDM(2002)
constants. The FRLDM(2012) fits 31 fission barrier heights from $^{70}$Se to
$^{252}$Cf with a root-mean-square deviation of 1.052 MeV.Comment: 233 pages, 41 figures. arXiv admin note: text overlap with
arXiv:nucl-th/930802
Paring correlations in weakly bound nuclei on the edge of neutron drip line
is studied by using a three-body model. A density-dependent contact interaction
is employed to calculate the ground state of halo nuclei $^{6}$He and
$^{11}$Li, as well as a skin nucleus $^{24}$O. Dipole excitations in these
nuclei are also studied within the same model. We point out that the di-neutron
type correlation plays a dominant role in the halo nuclei $^{6}$He and
$^{11}$Li having the coupled spin of the two neutrons $S$=0, while the
correlation similar to the BCS type is important in $^{24}$O. Contributions of
the spin $S$=1 and S=0 configurations are separately discussed in the low
energy dipole excitations.Comment: 6 pages, 12 eps figure
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.