Background. Iatrogenic biliary injuries are considered as the most serious complications during cholecystectomy. Better outcomes of such injuries have been shown in cases managed in a specialized center. Objective. To evaluate biliary injuries management in major referral hepatobiliary center. Patients & Methods. Four hundred seventy-two consecutive patients with postcholecystectomy biliary injuries were managed with multidisciplinary team (hepatobiliary surgeon, gastroenterologist, and radiologist) at major Hepatobiliary Center in Egypt over 10-year period using endoscopy in 232 patients, percutaneous techniques in 42 patients, and surgery in 198 patients. Results. Endoscopy was very successful initial treatment of 232 patients (49%) with mild/moderate biliary leakage (68%) and biliary stricture (47%) with increased success by addition of percutaneous (Rendezvous technique) in 18 patients (3.8%). However, surgery was needed in 198 patients (42%) for major duct transection, ligation, major leakage, and massive stricture. Surgery was urgent in 62 patients and elective in 136 patients. Hepaticojejunostomy was done in most of cases with transanastomotic stents. There was one mortality after surgery due to biliary sepsis and postoperative stricture in 3 cases (1.5%) treated with percutaneous dilation and stenting. Conclusion. Management of biliary injuries was much better with multidisciplinary care team with initial minimal invasive technique to major surgery in major complex injury encouraging early referral to highly specialized hepatobiliary center.

Objectives: The introduction of the living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in Egypt as in elsewhere, has raised important psychological conflicts and ethical questions. The objective of this study was to get better understanding of the potential donors’ motives toward LDLT.Methods: This study was conducted on consecutive 193 living-liver donors who underwent partial hepatectomy as donors for LDLT during the period between April 2003 and January 2013, at the National Liver Institute Menoufeyia University, Egypt. Potential donors were thoroughly evaluated preoperatively through a screening questionnaire and interviews as regard their demographic data, relationship to the potential recipient, and motives toward proceeding to surgery. They were assured that the information shared between them and the transplant center is confidential.Results: The donors’ mean age was 25.53 ± 6.39 years with a range of 18–45 years. Males represented 64.7% and females were 35.3%. The most common donors (32.1%, n = 62) were sons and daughters to their parents (sons: n = 43, daughters: n = 19) while parents to their offsprings represent 15% (mothers: n = 21, fathers: n = 8). Brothers and sisters represent 16.5% (brothers: n = 22, sisters: n = 10). Nephews and nieces giving their uncles or aunts were 14%. The number of wives donating to their husbands was 11 (5.7%). Interestingly, there was no single husband who donated his wife. Among the remaining donors, there were 11 cousins and 1 uncle. Unrelated donors were 20 (10.4%). Several factors seemed to contribute to motivation for donation: the seriousness of the potential recipient condition, the relationship and personal history of the donor to the potential recipient, the religious beliefs, the trust in the health care system, and family dynamics and obligations.Conclusion: Absolute absence of coercion on the living-liver donor’s motives may not be realistic because of the serious condition of the potential recipient. It is mandatory that the donor is truly willing to donate.

No abstract

Aim: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a promising treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but tumour recurrence can affect long-term survival. The aim of the present study was to identify the pattern of HCC recurrence after LDLT for early detection and management. Patients and Methods: From April 2003 to October 2014, the record of 60 patients who underwent LDLT for HCC at the National Liver Institute, Menoufia University, Egypt, were retrospectively reviewed. The clinicopathological data were analysed to determine factors associated with HCC recurrence and outcome. Results: Seven patients (11.7 per cent) had HCC recurrence after LDLT. Pretransplant α-fetoprotein (AFP) > 1000 ng/mL, tumour grade and microvascular invasion were the incriminated risk factors for recurrence. Three patients (42.8 per cent) had intrahepatic and extrahepatic recurrence (lung and bone), two patients (28.6 per cent) had only extrahepatic recurrence in bones and two patients (28.6 per cent) had only intrahepatic recurrence. Management was as follows: two patients (28.6 per cent) had surgical excision of intrahepatic recurrence and extrahepatic metastasis, two patients (28.6 per cent) underwent radiotherapy for bone metastasis, one patient (14.2 per cent) underwent intraoperative radiofrequency ablation for liver recurrence and two patients (28.6 per cent) received sorafenib as medical treatment. The mean time of recurrence was 19.7 months, and mean survival was 29 months. Conclusion: The majority of HCC recurrences after LDLT are extrahepatic and occur mainly in the first 2 years; strict follow up is required during this period. A high level of pretransplant serum AFP and microvascular invasion are risk factors for tumour recurrence and should be taken into account when selecting candidates for LDLT.

No abstract