Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) is elevated in asthmatics, and varies with disease severity. We postulated that a respiratory virus infection increases exhaled NO levels in asthma, and examined the relationship between the virus-induced changes in exhaled NO and in airway hyperresponsiveness to histamine. In a parallel study, seven patients underwent experimental rhinovirus 16 (RV16) inoculation at days 0 and 1, whilst seven patients received placebo. Exhaled NO was measured at baseline (day 0) and at days 1, 2 and 3 after inoculation. Histamine challenges were performed prior to (day -7) and after inoculation (day 3), and were expressed as provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (PC20). Following RV16 infection there was a significant increase in NO at days 2 and 3 as compared to baseline (median change (range): 4.2 (7.5) parts per billion (ppb), p=0.03, and 3.0 (10.1) ppb, p=0.02, respectively). Furthermore, PC20 decreased significantly following RV16 infection (mean+/-SD change in doubling dose: -0.65+/-0.54, p=0.02), whereas PC20 did not change in the placebo group (p=0.1). There was a significant correlation between the RV16-induced changes in exhaled NO levels at day 2 and the accompanying changes in PC20 at day 3 (rank correlation coefficient (rs): 0.86, p=0.01). Hence, the greater the increase in exhaled NO, the smaller the decrease in PC20. We conclude that rhinovirus infection increases exhaled nitric oxide levels in asthmatics, and that this increase is inversely associated with worsening of airway hyperresponsiveness to histamine. These results suggest that viral induction of nitric oxide synthase within the airways may play a protective role in exacerbations of asthma.

No abstract

Exhaled NO is increased in patients with asthma and may reflect disease severity. We examined whether the level of exhaled NO is related to the degree of airway obstruction induced by direct and indirect stimuli in asthma. Therefore, we measured exhaled NO levels before and during recovery from histamine and hypertonic saline (HS) challenge (Protocol 1) or histamine, adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP), and isotonic saline (IS) challenge (Protocol 2) in 11 and in nine patients with mild to moderate asthma, respectively. The challenges were randomized with a 2-d interval. Exhaled NO and FEV1 were measured before and at 4, 10, 20, and 30 min after each challenge. NO was measured during a slow VC maneuver with a constant expiratory flow of (0.05 x FVC)/s against a resistance of 1 to 2 cm H2O. Baseline exhaled NO levels were not significantly different between study days in Protocol 1 (mean +/- SD: 4.8 +/- 1.8 ppb [histamine] versus 5.4 +/- 2.1 ppb [HS], p = 0.4) or in Protocol 2 (7.9 +/- 4.7 ppb [histamine], 8.3 +/- 5.2 ppb [AMP], and 7.2 +/- 3.7 ppb [IS], p = 0.7). A significant reduction in exhaled NO was observed directly after HS (mean +/- SEM: 39.2 +/- 3.9 %fall) and AMP challenge (32.3 +/- 7.3 %fall) (MANOVA, p < 0.001), respectively, whereas exhaled NO levels tended to decrease after histamine challenge. Isotonic saline challenge did not induce changes in exhaled NO (p = 0.7). There was a positive correlation between %fall in FEV1 and the %fall in exhaled NO after histamine, HS, and AMP challenge as indicated by the mean slope of the within-subject regression lines (p <= 0.04). We conclude that acute bronchoconstriction, as induced by direct and indirect stimuli, is associated with a reduction in exhaled NO levels in asthmatic subjects. This suggests that airway caliber should be taken into account when monitoring exhaled NO in asthma.

R Re ep pe ea at ta ab bi il li it ty y o of f c ce el ll lu ul la ar r a an nd d s so ol lu ub bl le e m ma ar rk ke er rs s o of f i in nf fl la am mm ma at ti io on n i in n i in nd du uc ce ed d s sp pu ut tu um m f fr ro om m p pa at ti ie en nt ts s w wi it th h a as st th hm ma a ABSTRACT: Sputum induced by inhalation of nebulized hypertonic saline is increasingly used to monitor airways inflammation in asthma. The aim of this study was to assess the repeatability of measuring cellular and soluble markers of inflammation in whole sputum samples as obtained by sputum induction in patients both with mild and moderate-to-severe asthma. Twelve patients with mild, atopic asthma without inhaled steroid treatment and nine patients with moderate-to-severe, atopic asthma treated with inhaled steroids were studied on two separate days at least 2 days apart. Whole sputum samples, induced by inhalation of hypertonic (4.5%) saline, were homogenized, and analysed for differential cell counts and for concentrations of albumin, fibrinogen, inter- leukin-8 (IL-8), and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). Repeatability was expressed as intraclass correlation coefficient (Ri), and as coefficient of repeatability (CR) in percentage cells or in doubling concentration.Samples from two patients with mild asthma contained more than 80% squamous cells and were excluded from analysis. The repeatability for cell differential counts in both groups combined was: for neutrophils, Ri=0.57 and CR=31.0; for eosinophils, Ri=0.85 and CR=12.4; and for lymphocytes, Ri=0.76 and CR=6.9. The repeatability of the fluid phase measurements was: for albumin, Ri=0.71 and CR=3.2; for fibrinogen, Ri=0.88 and CR=2.8; for IL-8, Ri=0.66 and CR=2.2; and for ECP, Ri=0.82 and CR=1.1.We conclude that the repeatability of cellular and soluble markers of inflammation in induced sputum from patients with mild and moderate-to-severe asthma is satisfactory. Hence, induced sputum, processed by using the whole expectorated sample, seems to be a valuable method to monitor airway inflammation in asthma.

A role of nitric oxide (NO) has been suggested in the airway response to exercise. However, it is unclear whether NO may act as a protective or a stimulatory factor. Therefore, we examined the role of NO in the airway response to exercise by using N-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA, an NO synthase inhibitor), L-arginine (the NO synthase substrate), or placebo as pretreatment to exercise challenge in 12 healthy nonsmoking, nonatopic subjects and 12 nonsmoking, atopic asthmatic patients in a double-blind, crossover study. Fifteen minutes after inhalation of L-NMMA (10 mg), L-arginine (375 mg), or placebo, standardized bicycle ergometry was performed for 6 min using dry air, while ventilation was kept constant. The forced expiratory volume in 1-s response was expressed as area under the time-response curve (AUC) over 30 min. In healthy subjects, there was no significant change in AUC between L-NMMA and placebo treatment [28.6 +/- 17.0 and 1.3 +/- 20.4 (SE) for placebo and L-NMMA, respectively, P = 0.2]. In the asthmatic group, L-NMMA and L-arginine induced significant changes in exhaled NO (P < 0.01) but had no significant effect on AUC compared with placebo (geometric mean +/- SE: -204.3 +/- 1.5, -186.9 +/- 1.4, and -318.1 +/- 1.2%. h for placebo, L-NMMA, and L-arginine, respectively, P > 0.2). However, there was a borderline significant difference in AUC between L-NMMA and L-arginine treatment (P = 0.052). We conclude that modulation of NO synthesis has no effect on the airway response to exercise in healthy subjects but that NO synthesis inhibition slightly attenuates exercise-induced bronchoconstriction compared with NO synthase substrate supplementation in asthma. These data suggest that the net effect of endogenous NO is not inhibitory during exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma.