BackgroundAn unexpected difficult intubation can be very challenging and if it is not managed properly, it may expose the encountered patient to significant risks. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS) has been used as a validated method to evaluate a global degree of intubation difficulty. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of unexpected difficult intubation using the IDS.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 951 patients undergoing elective surgery in a single medical center. Patients expected to have a difficult intubation or who had history of difficult intubation were excluded. Each patient was assessed by the IDS scoring system with seven variables. Total prevalence of difficult intubation and the contributing individual factors were further analyzed.ResultsFor the 951 patients, the difficult intubation cases presenting IDS > 5 was 5.8% of total cases (n = 55). The prevalence of Cormack-Lehane Grade 3 or 4 was 16.2% (n = 154). Most of the difficult intubation cases were managed by simple additional maneuvers and techniques such as stylet application, additional lifting force and laryngeal pressure.ConclusionsUnexpected difficult airway was present in 5.8% of patients and most was managed effectively. Among the components of IDS, the Cormack-Lehane grade was most sensitive for predicting difficult intubation.

ObjectivesWe aimed to identify the optimal lower limb position for an ultrasound (US)‐guided anterior approach to a sciatic nerve block.MethodsWe included 45 patients who met the following criteria: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status of 1 to 3, age between 18 and 80 years, and scheduled to undergo knee surgery that required a sciatic nerve block. The lower limbs of each patient were placed in the following 4 positions: N, neutral; ER, external rotation of the hip (angle, 45°); ER/F15, ER (angle, 45°) and flexion (angle, 15°) of the hip; and ER/F45, ER (angle, 45°) and F (angle, 45°) of the hip. An investigator acquired US scans of the sciatic nerve in each position, and the visibility score and depth of the sciatic nerve from the skin were analyzed.ResultsThe visibility scores were significantly higher in positions ER/F15 and ER/F45 than in positions ER and N (P < .0001). However, there was no difference between the visibility scores in positions ER/F15 and ER/F45 (P = .0959). The depth of the sciatic nerve from the skin decreased with ER and an increase in the F angle of the hip (overall P < .0001).ConclusionsBased on the visibility score and depth from the skin, ER of the hip to 45° with a greater F angle (45° versus 15°) of the hip appears to be the optimal position for an US‐guided anterior approach to a sciatic nerve block.