No abstract

IMPORTANCE Trauma is the leading cause of death for US individuals younger than 45 years, and uncontrolled hemorrhage is a major cause of trauma mortality. The US military's medical advancements in the field of prehospital hemorrhage control have reduced battlefield mortality by 44%. However, despite support from many national health care organizations, no integrated approach to research has been made regarding implementation, epidemiology, education, and logistics of prehospital hemorrhage control by layperson immediate responders in the civilian sector. OBJECTIVE To create a national research agenda to help guide future work for prehospital hemorrhage control by laypersons. EVIDENCE REVIEW The 2-day, in-person, National Stop the Bleed (STB) Research Consensus Conference was conducted on February 27 to 28, 2019, to identify and achieve consensus on research gaps. Participants included (1) subject matter experts, (2) professional society-designated leaders, (3) representatives from the federal government, and (4) representatives from private foundations. Before the conference, participants were provided a scoping review on layperson prehospital hemorrhage control. A 3-round modified Delphi consensus process was conducted to determine high-priority research questions. The top items, with median rating of 8 or more on a Likert scale of 1 to 9 points, were identified and became part of the national STB research agenda. FINDINGS Forty-five participants attended the conference. In round 1, participants submitted 487 research questions. After deduplication and sorting, 162 questions remained across 5 a prioridefined themes. Two subsequent rounds of rating generated consensus on 113 high-priority, 27 uncertain-priority, and 22 low-priority questions. The final prioritized research agenda included the top 24 questions, including 8 for epidemiology and effectiveness, 4 for materials, 9 for education, 2 for global health, and 1 for health policy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The National STB Research Consensus Conference identified and prioritized a national research agenda to support laypersons in reducing preventable deaths due to life-threatening hemorrhage. Investigators and funding agencies can use this agenda to guide their future work and funding priorities.

Necrotizing soft tissue infection of the perineum, or Fournier's gangrene (FG), is a morbid and mortal diagnosis. Despite the severity of FG, the optimal definitive wound closure strategy is unknown, as are long-term wound outcomes. A retrospective review was performed over a 3-year period at a single trauma center. Patients were managed according to our institutional approach focusing on primary wound closure and secondary intention healing in residual wounds. Overall 168 patients were included. Complete primary wound closure was accomplished in 39.9 per cent of patients. Patients undergoing primary wound closure were primarily male (89.6 vs 64.4%, P < 0.001), had lower mean sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores (1.70 ± 2.30 vs 2.98 ± 3.36, P = 0.004), more often had perineum-limited FG (67.2 vs 42.6%, P = 0.003), and required fewer debridements (2.40 vs 2.79, P = 0.02). On logistic regression, predictors of primary closure included gender (odds ratio 4.643, 95% confidence interval 1.885–11.437, P = 0.001) and SOFA score (odds ratio 0.834, 95% confidence interval 0.727–0.957, P = 0.01). Wound healing rates increased over time, to an 82.1 per cent wound healing rate without further intervention at greater than six months of follow-up. Wounds healed with secondary intention ranged from 70 to 9520 cm3 and primary closure ranged from 126 to 6912 cm3, whereas wounds requiring skin grafts ranged from 405 to 16,170 cm3. Complete primary wound closure is often achievable in FG patients. Using this standardized approach to FG wound management, even large wounds and wounds undergoing secondary intention healing will often close with long-term wound care and do not require flap creation or early skin grafting.

To our knowledge, this is the largest study of the benefit of percutaneous tracheostomy in a critically injured trauma population. The risk of SSI is significantly lower after percutaneous than open tracheostomy.

No abstract