No abstract

We investigated the protective effect of telmisartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, against ischemia/reperfusion renal injury in rats. Bilateral ischemia was induced by clamping both renal vascular pedicles for 45 min followed by reperfusion for 3 h. Untreated rats exposed to ischemia/reperfusion showed significant elevations in blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine levels, renal tissue levels of malondialdehyde, tumor necrosis factor-α and nitric oxide, and caspase-3 activity. This was associated with significant decreases in renal reduced glutathione level, catalase and superoxide dismutase activities. Also, significant increases in serum and renal tissue levels of homocysteine were detected following ischemia/reperfusion. Pre-ischemic treatment with telmisartan (0.3 mg/kg/day, i.p.) for 7 consecutive days significantly attenuated the increases in blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, renal malondialdehyde, tumor necrosis factor-α, nitric oxide, caspase-3 activity, and serum and renal homocysteine levels, and significantly restored the renal antioxidant defenses. In addition, light and electron microscopic examinations revealed that telmisartan pre-treatment markedly ameliorated ischemia/reperfusion-induced renal tissue damage. It was concluded that telmisartan, through its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic effects, can be considered a potential candidate to protect against acute ischemia/reperfusion renal injury.

No abstract

Background and Aims:In recent years there has been a growing appreciation of the issues of career preference in medicine as it affects student learning and academic performance. Various factors influence the specialty choices of medical students. Some specialties tend to attract students more than others. One possible consequence of this would be a mismatch between health needs and specialist numbers in the region. This study investigated the career preferences of 1st year medical students in a Saudi medical school and to assess factors affecting these choices.Materials and Methods:The study was a cross-sectional survey carried out on the 1st year undergraduate students in the college of medicine, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia. A total of 109 students (57 female and 52 males) responded to the questionnaire which was initially administered to all the students of the 1st year – A total of 120 students (response rate was 90.8%). A mixed method approach was used and qualitative data from open-ended questions were analyzed based on thematic analysis.Results:The top choices were general surgery, internal medicine, and pediatrics. Among female students; the top specialty choices were: General surgery (23%), pediatrics (18%), and dermatology (15%). Among the male students; the top choices were: General surgery (54%) and internal medicine (23%). Of the total, 57% of the students agreed or strongly agreed that primary aptitude was the main factor affecting the choice. Only 31% felt that there was a significant influence of role model, 48% felt that the advice of others – peers and family, would be a factor influencing their choices, and 53% agreed that specialty choice would influence their future learning patterns. Males were more likely to choose a specialty based on actual aptitude for the specialty, financial rewards, and scope for research; and this gender difference was statistically significant.Conclusion:Surgery was the top-choice in both genders. Other popular choices included internal medicine, pediatrics, and dermatology. Important factors affecting these choices included – primary aptitude, advice of peers, reputation, financial rewards, and the challenge involved.

Introduction and Background:Cosmetic procedures for hair, such as bleaching, dyeing, and straightening, are commonly used around the world. It has been suggested that excessive use of such procedures can cause damage to the hair shaft. We aimed to assess hair shaft changes using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) in female volunteers who frequently use hair treatment procedures such as bleaching, dyeing, or straightening.Methods:A cross-sectional, controlled study in a sample of 25 female volunteers (19 study group and 6 controls) in the age group of 18–45 years. The study group was composed of volunteers who regularly used different cosmetic hair treatment procedures such as bleaching, dyeing, and straightening (any one of these or a combination). The control group had never used any specific hair treatment procedure. The hair shaft damage as seen on SEM was assessed using a standardized scoring system and compared among the two groups statistically. The hair shafts were also examined clinically and with light microscopy.Results:No significant differences were seen between the test and control groups with regard to normal clinical examination and light microscopy findings. A higher degree of hair shaft damage was evident under SEM in the study group as compared to the control group. This difference was statistically significant.Conclusions:Regular use of procedures such as bleaching, dyeing, or straightening can lead to subtle changes in the hair shaft which can be detected early by SEM.