No abstract

Adaptations of fruit trees to future climate are a current research priority due to the rapid increase in air temperature and changes in precipitation patterns. This is aimed at securing sustainable food production for our growing populations. Key physiological traits in trees conferring drought tolerance are resistance to embolism and stomatal control over water loss. Recently, we have shown in the field that a native wild pear species performs better under drought than two cultivated pear species. A comparative greenhouse study was conducted to investigate traits associated with drought tolerance in four ecotypes of a wild pear species (Pyrus syriaca Boiss), compared with a wild pear species (Pyrus betulifolia Bunge) commonly used as a pear rootstock. Seed sources were collected from semi-arid, sub-humid and humid sites across northern Israel. Measurements of water relations, leaf physiology, hydraulic conductivity and percent loss of hydraulic conductivity (PLC) were conducted under standard irrigation, drought and recovery from drought. The four P. syriaca ecotypes maintained significantly higher leaf gas exchange values and water-use efficiency and had lower PLC than the rootstock species under prolonged drought as well as during recovery. Across the four ecotypes, stomatal closure occurred at stem water potential (Ψ) around −3.5 MPa; however, Ψ at 50% PLC ranged from −4.1 MPa in the humid ecotype to −5.2 MPa in one of the semi-arid ecotypes, rendering the latter with a higher hydraulic safety margin (the Ψ difference between stomatal closure and 50% PLC). Divergence of the ecotypes in xylem vulnerability to embolism closely matched the mean annual precipitation at their seed sources. Thus, selection of pear ecotypes from populations in semi-arid sites may be better than the currently used plant material for preparing our cultivated species for hotter and drier future climate.

Trees of the genus Prunus produce some of the most widely consumed fruits globally. The combination of climate change-related warming and increased drought stress, scarcity of freshwater resources for irrigation, and increasing demands due to population growth creates a need for increased drought tolerance in these tree species. Recently, we have shown in the field that a native wild pear species performs better under drought than two cultivated pear species. Here, a comparative field study was conducted in Israel to investigate traits associated with drought tolerance in almond (cultivated Prunus dulcis (Mill.) D. A. Webb vs wild Prunus ramonensis Danin) and plum (cultivated Prunus domestica L. vs wild Prunus ursina Kotschy). Measurements of xylem embolism and shoot and root carbon reserves were done along a year, including seasonal drought in the wild and a 35-day drought experiment in the orchards. Synchronous measurements of native xylem embolism and shoot water potential showed that cultivated and wild almond trees lost ~50% of hydraulic conductivity at −2.3 and −3.2 MPa, respectively. Micro-CT images confirmed the higher embolism ratio in cultivated versus wild almond, whereas the two plum species were similar. Dynamics of tissue concentrations of nonstructural carbohydrates were mostly similar across species, with higher levels in cultivated versus wild plum. Our results indicate an advantage for the wild almond over its cultivated relative in terms of xylem resistance to embolism, a major risk factor for trees under drought stress. This result is in line with our previous experiment on pear species. However, the opposite trends observed among the studied plum species mean that these trends cannot be generalized. It is possible that the potential for superior drought tolerance in wild tree species, relative to their cultivated relatives, is limited to wild species from dry and hot habitats.

No abstract