Background:There is no head-to-head trial comparing ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF). Aim:To compare the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with CD refractory to anti-TNF in a multicentre retrospective observational cohort.Methods: All consecutive patients with CD refractory or intolerant to anti-TNF who initiated either vedolizumab or ustekinumab were included between May 2014 and August 2018. Clinical remission, steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) and treatment persistence were assessed at week 48 with intention-to-treat analysis and propensity scores weighted comparison.Results: A total of 239 patients were included, 107 received ustekinumab and 132 received vedolizumab. At week 48, ustekinumab was associated with a higher clinical remission rate (54.4% vs 38.3%; odds ratios, OR = 1.92, 95% CI [1.09-3.39]) and treatment persistence (71.5% vs 49.7%; OR = 2.54, 95% CI [1.40-4.62]) than vedolizumab.The rate of SFCR did not differ significantly between ustekinumab and vedolizumab (44.7% vs 34.0%; OR = 1.57, 95% CI [0.88-2.79]). Subgroup analyses showed that ustekinumab was associated with a higher clinical remission rates at week 48 in patients with ileal location (OR = 3.49, 95% CI [1.33-9.17) and penetrating behaviour (OR = 6.58, 95% CI [1. 91-22.68]). Regardless of the treatment group, combination therapy at initiation was associated with a higher clinical remission rate at week 48 (OR = 1.93, 95% CI [1.09-3.43]). Conclusion:This study suggests that ustekinumab is associated with a higher rate of clinical remission and treatment persistence than vedolizumab after 48 weeks of follow-up, in patients with CD refractory or intolerant to anti-TNF. The rate of SFCR was not significantly different. | 949 ALRIC et AL.

Introduction Vedolizumab clinical decision support tool (VDZ-CDST) predicts response to vedolizumab, but whether this tool also predicts efficacy of other drugs in Crohn’s disease (CD) is unknown. This study aimed to assess the value of VDZ-CDST to predict vedolizumab and ustekinumab efficacy in patients with CD. Patients and methods We included consecutive CD patients refractory or intolerant to anti-TNF who started either vedolizumab or ustekinumab in 5 university hospitals between May 2014 and August 2018. The main end points were the rates of clinical remission and steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) in each group of VDZ-CDST at week 48. Results One hundred eighty patients were included; 94 received vedolizumab (VDZ-CDST ≤13: 32; VDZ-CDST >13 and ≤19: 52; VDZ-CDST >19: 10), and 86 received ustekinumab (VDZ-CDST ≤13: 16; VDZ-CDST >13 and ≤19: 60; VDZ-CDST >19: 10). At week 48 in the vedolizumab group, clinical remission and SFCR were reached in 9.4% with a VDZ-CDST ≤13, in 38.5% and 28.8% with a VDZ-CDST >13 and ≤19, respectively, and in 80.0% with a VDZ-CDST >19 (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). In the ustekinumab cohort, clinical remission and SFCR were reached in 43.8% and 37.5% with a VDZ-CDST ≤13, in 55.0% and 50.0% with a VDZ-CDST >13 and ≤19, and 50.0% with a VDZ-CDST >19, respectively (P = 0.65 and P = 0.46, respectively). VDZ-CDST identified SFCR with an area under the curve of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.57–0.82) for vedolizumab and 0.52 (95% CI, 0.40–0.65) for ustekinumab. Conclusion The VDZ-CDST predicts clinical remission and SFCR at week 48 for vedolizumab but not for ustekinumab in CD patients refractory or intolerant to anti-TNF.