Purpose When using tension band plates for angular deformity correction, the literature is unclear regarding the most effective screw insertion angle to use. This study evaluates the correlation between initial screw angle and the average rate of correction during hemiepiphysiodesis using tension band plates Methods This retrospective study includes 35 patients (47 physes) with genu valgum deformity (17 idiopathic and 18 fibular hemimelia) who underwent insertion of Eight-Plates between 2010 and 2015. Initial screw angle was determined from the intraoperative fluoroscopic images. Radiographs were obtained within three months of surgery, and follow-up films were obtained every three to six months. Change in mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibial angle and screw angle was obtained from each follow-up radiograph. Initial screw angle was correlated with the average rate of correction during the entire treatment period. The average rate of angular correction during first and last follow-up periods was also compared. Results The relationship between the initial screw angle and the mean rate of angular correction was not statistically significant (p = 0.2). The rate of angular correction during the first follow-up period (mean of 4.7 months) was 0.86° per month compared with 0.71° per month during the last follow-up period (mean of 5.1 months). Conclusion Application of a tension band plate with a divergence angle ranging from 0° to 30° results in similar rates of angular correction. For surgeons inserting screw-plate tension band devices, there does not seem to be any necessity to make the screws parallel or divergent. We recommend that screw placement be anatomically correct, i.e. not impinging on the physis, rather than favouring any particular divergence angle. Level of evidence IV

Introduction: PRECICE intramedullary magnetic lengthening nails, introduced in 2011, have changed the landscape of long bone limb lengthening. The implants have a stroke ranging from 5 to 8 cm, but it may be desirable to perform part of the lengthening at one treatment, allow bone healing, leave the implant in place, dormant, and then return one or more years later to re-lengthen with the same implant. We call this the "sleeper" nail concept. This strategy may be gentler for the joints and soft tissues. Would the nail mechanism still be functional one or more years later? Methods: We tested 102 intact, consecutively explanted nails. Using a "fast magnet," the male part was lengthened to 5 mm short of its maximum stroke capacity and retracted back to 35 mm (all nails start with the male part exposed 30 mm). The nails passed the test if the male part succeeded in lengthening to 5 mm short of the maximum stroke capacity and back to 35 mm (or only retract in case fully deployed at testing). During our testing, the nails were prevented from reaching their full capacity of lengthening/ retraction to avoid jamming the gears. Failure was defined as the inability or partial ability to complete the process. Results: Eighty-six nails (84.3%) performed successfully according to our testing standard. When comparing successful and failed nails in terms of nail type, generation, diameter, length and in vivo interval, there was no statistical significance. Comparing both groups in terms of status at testing (fully deployed or not) showed statistical significance with 9 of the 16 failed nails fully deployed at testing (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Dormant PRECICE nails can be reactivated for further lengthening. The results imply that full deployment may damage the mechanism, making future re-use by retracting and then re-lengthening unsuccessful. The candidate nails for this purpose should not have any signs of clear damage (bending or breakage) and should not have been fully deployed. However, surgeons and patients should be aware of the need for possible nail exchange if the "sleeper" nail fails to wake up. Level of evidence: Level IV case series analysis of retrieved surgical implants.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to validate the accuracy of the Multiplier Method (MM) in predicting the timing of angular correction after hemiepiphysiodesis and to determine the role of using skeletal age when calculating those predictions. Methods: This retrospective study included 131 physes in 77 patients treated with hemiepiphysiodesis to gradually correct a coronal plane deformity before skeletal maturity. To compare the MM’s predictions to the actual treatment duration, the “desired angular correction” was considered the actual achieved angular correction determined from the “endpoint x-ray” (last x-ray before implant removal). We measured the bone length and width of the growth plate from the preoperative x-ray and calculated the MM’s prediction of the duration of treatment based on the MM formula. We compared the predicted duration to the observed duration of treatment for each case. The difference was calculated by subtracting the observed duration from the predicted duration. The result was the “absolute difference,” which is the number of months over or under predicted by the MM. Results: The mean absolute difference between the MM’s predicted duration and the observed duration was 2.31 months, which was highly significant (P≤0.001). The MM’s prediction agreed with the observed duration of treatment (ie, zero absolute difference) in 15% of the predictions, 69% were under predicted, and 16% were over predicted. Sixty-eight percent of the absolute differences were within 3 months regardless of the direction of error. The mean difference was relatively less in genu varum cases and was statistically significant (P=0.047). Comparing the mean difference using chronological age and skeletal age in the formula showed no statistically significant difference. Conclusions: The MM has a tendency to under predict. Therefore, doing a guided growth right before skeletal maturity should be started 2 to 4 months earlier than suggested by the MM. Moreover, our data did not show that the bone age gave more accurate predictions than chronological age. Level of Evidence: Level IV.