In the present study, high-performance liquid chromatography micro-fraction bioactive evaluation and high speed countercurrent chromatography were performed on screening, identification and isolation of antioxidants from Citrus peel. Three compounds were screened as antioxidants and tyrosinase inhibitors using 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical cation scavenging assay and tyrosinase activity test, then they were identified as eriocitrin, narirutin and hesperidin. Moreover, the solvent system ethyl acetate-n-butanolwater (6:4:10, v/v/v) was used for separation of ethyl acetate extract of Citrus peel by high speed countercurrent chromatography. In total, 0.45 mg of eriocitrin with 87.10% purity, 2.04 mg of narirutin with 95.19% purity and 1.35 mg of hesperidin with 95.19% purity were obtained from 20 mg of ethyl acetate extract of Citrus peel in a single run and then each component was subjected to 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) radical cation scavenging assay and tyrosinase inhibition assay. Eriocitrin showed great antioxidant activity (the half-maximum concentration: 3.65 µM) and tyrosinase inhibition activity (the half-maximum concentration: 115.67 µM), while narirutin and hesperidin exhibited moderate activity. Tyrosinase inhibition activity for eriocitrin in vitro was reported for the first time. Furthermore, molecular docking between eriocitrin and mushroom tyrosinase was also studied.
Two anionic β-cyclodextrins as chiral selectors were successfully applied in the enantioseparation of N-methyl duloxetine, duloxetine, and fluoxetine by countercurrent chromatography. Sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin and carboxymethylβ-cyclodextrin showed opposite enantioselectivity for both duloxetine and N-methyl duloxetine enantiomers. Two biphasic solvent systems, n-hexane: 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer pH 7.6 with 50 mmol/L of sulfobutyl ether-βcyclodextrin (1:1, v/v) and n-hexane: 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer pH 7.2 with 50 mmol/L of carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin (1:1, v/v), were selected for Nmethyl duloxetine. Enantioseparation of duloxetine was achieved by recycling countercurrent chromatography using a solvent system composed of n-butyl acetate: 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer pH 7.2 with 20 mmol/L of sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin or carboxymethyl-β-cyclodextrin (1:1, v/v). A solvent system composed of n-hexane: n-butyl acetate: 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer pH 7.6 containing 20 mmol/L of sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin (6:4:10, v/v) was selected for enantioseparation of fluoxetine.
Analytical enantioseparations of five N-alkyl drugs, fluoxetine hydrochloride, labetalol, venlafaxine hydrochloride, trans-paroxol, and atropine sulfate, were investigated by reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography with sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin as chiral mobile phase additive. Effects of various factors such as composition of mobile phase, concentration of cyclodextrins, and column temperature on retention and enantioselectivity were studied. Apparent formation constant between methanol, acetonitrile, and sulfobutylether-βcyclodextrin were determined to be 2.90 × 10 −3 and 1.00 × 10 −4 L mmol −1 under 25 • C using UV-spectrophotometry. Van't Hoff plots were used to investigate thermodynamic parameters for enantiomers-stationary phase interaction and formation of inclusion complex. Two retention models were employed individually for evaluation of inclusion complexation between five racemates and sulfobutylether-β-cyclodextrin. The second model with complex adsorption was more accord with the retention behavior of fluoxetine hydrochloride, labetalol, and venlafaxine hydrochloride enantiomers, while the first model was more consistent with the retention behaviors of trans-paroxol and atropine sulfate.In the selected mobile phase, stoichiometric ratio for both of inclusion complex was found to be 1:1.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.