No abstract

This paper presents a proposed supervised classification technique namely partial histogram Bayes (PHBayes) learning algorithm. Conventional classifier based on Gaussian function has limitation when dealing with different probability distribution functions and requires large memory for large number of instance. Alternatively, histogram based classifiers are flexible for different probability density function. The aims of PHBayes are to handle large number of instances in datasets with lesser memory requirement, and fast in training and testing phases. The PHBayes depends on portion of the observed histogram that is similar to the probability density function. PHBayes was analyzed using synthetic and real data. Several factors affecting classification accuracy were considered. The PHBayes was compared with other established classifiers and demonstrated higher accurate classification, lesser memory even when dealing with large number of instance, and faster in training and testing phases.

<em>This paper presents a proposed supervised classification technique namely flexible partial histogram Bayes (fPHBayes) learning algorithm. In our previous work, partial histogram Bayes (PHBayes) learning algorithm showed some advantages in the aspects of speed and accuracy in classification tasks. However, its accuracy declines when dealing with small number of instances or when the class feature distributes in wide area. In this work, the proposed fPHBayes solves these limitations in order to increase the classification accuracy. fPHBayes was analyzed and compared with PHBayes and other standard learning algorithms like first nearest neighbor, nearest subclass mean, nearest class mean, naive Bayes and Gaussian mixture model classifier. The experiments were performed using both real data and synthetic data considering different number of instances and different variances of Gaussians. The results showed that fPHBayes is more accurate and flexible to deal with different number of instances and different variances of Gaussians as compared to PHBayes.</em>