Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a global pandemic with significant morbidity and mortality. The Saudi government adopted mandatory home quarantine and curfew hours for all residents, excluding essential service workers. During the lockdown, the public's fear of infection can adversely impact mental health, causing psychological distress. The objective of this research is to assess frequency of depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) among the general population during COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised assessment test (OCI-R) in Arabic and English languages distributed via social media platforms. Chi-square test was used with significance determined at p<0.005. Results: We received a total of 2187 responses. Our results showed that being female, single, and unemployed had a higher frequency of suffering from depression whereas higher income levels and higher education was associated with less depression frequency. Increasing age, males, married individuals, higher income groups, higher levels of education and employed individuals were more likely to have OCD during COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic period is associated with significant mental health risks among the Saudi population. The results can provide further scientific support to better understand the impact of quarantine on psychological distress and mental health during emergency and disaster situations.

Objective.A multiethnic systemic sclerosis (SSc) cohort study to evaluate ethnic variations in disease manifestations, internal organ involvement, and survival.Methods.Adults who fulfilled the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for SSc between 1970 and 2017 were included. Self-reported ethnicity was categorized as European-descent white, Afro-Caribbean, Hispanic, Arab, East Asian, South Asian, First Nations, or Persian. The primary outcome was the time from diagnosis to death from all causes. Survival probabilities and median survival times were determined using Kaplan-Meier survival curves.Results.There were 1005 subjects evaluated, the majority of whom were European-descent white (n = 745, 74%), Afro-Caribbean (n = 58, 6%), South Asian (n = 70, 7%), and East Asian (n = 80, 8%). Compared to European-descent white subjects, East Asians less frequently had calcinosis (29% vs 9%, p = 0.002) and esophageal dysmotility (88% vs 69%, p = 0.002); Afro-Caribbeans more frequently had interstitial lung disease (31% vs 53%, p = 0.007); and First Nations subjects more frequently had diffuse cutaneous disease (35% vs 56%, p = 0.02) and diabetes (5% vs 33%, p = 0.03). We found no difference in the short-term survival across ethnicities. Hispanic subjects have better longterm survival (81.3%, 95% CI 63–100) compared to European-descent white subjects (55%, 95% CI 51–60). East Asians appear to have the longest median survival time (43.3 yrs) and Arabs the shortest median survival time (15 yrs). There was no significant difference in median survival times between Afro-Caribbean and European-descent white subjects (22.2 vs 22.6 yrs).Conclusion.Ethnic variations in some SSc disease manifestations are observed. However, this does not result in significant differences in short-term survival but may affect longterm survival.

No abstract