Objective: Nasal surgeries (such as Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery, Rhinoplasty, and Septorhinoplasty) are popular procedures. But perioperative bleeding, eyelid edema, and periorbital ecchymosis remain problems. Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an antifibrinolytic, and it was used to reduce the perioperative bleeding. However, there is no enough evidence judging its safety and efficiency. Therefore, a meta-analysis is conducted by us to evaluate the role of TXA in patients undergoing nasal surgeries. Method: A search of the literature was performed until June 2018; the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar databases were searched for related articles using search strategy. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of the included studies and extracted data. Surgical information and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Only randomized controlled trial (RCT) articles were included, and subgroup analysis was established to deal with heterogeneity. RevMan 5.3 software was selected to conduct the meta-analysis. Result: Eleven RCTs were included in our meta-analysis. There were significant differences in blood loss ( P < .001), surgical field quality ( P < .001), edema rating of upper ( P < .001) and lower ( P < .001) eyelid, ecchymosis rating of upper ( P < .001) and lower eyelid ( P < .001) when comparing the TXA group to the placebo group. However, the difference in operation time ( P = .57) was not significant between the two groups. Conclusion: Perioperative TXA could reduce the blood loss and improve the quality of surgery field during nasal surgery, and it was helpful for reducing the edema and ecchymosis after nasal surgeries, but it has little influence in reducing the operation time.

Background: Striae distensae (SD) are common and aesthetically undesirable dermal lesions. The aim of this study is to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of different therapies in treating striae distensae using network meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases up to December 1, 2019 was conducted. Randomized controlled trails (RCTs) examining the effectiveness of different methods in treating striae distensae were included. The primary outcomes are clinical effective rate and patient's satisfaction degree. Risk of bias was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Network meta-analysis was based on Bayesian framework. Results: Fourteen trails that met the criteria with 651 subjects were included. The results of the network meta-analysis show that topical tretinoin combined bipolar radiofrequency showed the highest probability of being the best method to improve the clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction rate of treating SD (84.5% and 95.7% respectively), closely followed by bipolar radiofrequency (75.3% and 84.3% respectively). Among laser treatment, CO 2 fractional laser is superior to other lasers in the clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction (72.0% and 58.1% respectively). Statistics showed the topical tretinoin was the worst-performing option in improving the clinical effectiveness and patient satisfaction rate of SD treatment (5.4% and 5.1% respectively). Conclusion: Based on the results of network meta-analysis, we recommend treating striae distensae with bipolar radio frequency combined topical tretinoin. The commonly used CO 2 fractional laser can be considered as alternative treatment candidate. Additional large-scale RCTs are necessary to obtain more precise estimates of their relative efficacy.

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Click https://www.wileyhealthlearning.com/ced.aspx for the corresponding questions to this CME article.