No abstract

Since the Z0011 trial, the clinical evaluation of axillary status has been redirected to predicting nodal tumor burden rather than nodal metastases. Our study aimed to evaluate the value of clinicopathological factors and axillary ultrasound (US) for the prediction of a high nodal burden (≥3 metastatic lymph nodes) in breast cancer patients. A total of 532 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative axillary US and subsequent surgery for clinical T1–2 breast cancer with a final pathologic analysis were included. Clinical and pathologic variables were retrospectively evaluated. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed to identify the variables that were associated with a high nodal burden. Among the 532 patients, 110 (20.7%) had a high axillary nodal burden and 422 (79.3%) had a limited nodal burden. The multivariate analysis showed that suspicious axillary US findings (P < 0.001), clinical T2 stage (P = 0.011), the presence of lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001), and estrogen receptor positivity (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with a high nodal burden. Patients with negative axillary US findings seldom had a high nodal burden, with a negative predictive value of 93.0% (294/316). Patients with suspicious axillary US findings, clinical T2 stage, lymphovascular invasion, and estrogen receptor positivity are more likely to have a high nodal burden, which may provide additional information for the treatment plan of breast cancer patients. Preoperative axillary US helps identify a limited nodal burden in breast cancer patients and has implications for axillary lymph node dissection and adjuvant treatment.

Enrolment in a CT was allowed at any time post-dx. Multivariable logistic regression assessed factors associated with enrolment. Multiple linear regression and Cox proportional hazard models evaluated the relationship of enrolment with quality of life (QOL; EORTC QLQ-C30 summary score) and clinical outcomes (distant disease free [dDFS], invasive [iDFS] and overall survival [OS]; adjusting by age, stage, subtype, comorbidities), respectively.

No abstract

Background: An increasing number of studies have applied ultrasound (US) to evaluate enthesitis in spondyloarthritis. However, there is no clear agreement on which sites should be evaluated for enthesitis. Furthermore, there are different opinions on whether US can monitor disease activity. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the common involvement of entheses and correlations between disease activity and US scores in ankylosing spondylitis (AS).Methods: A cross-sectional, monocentric, and controlled study was performed. US was used to scan 34 entheses per person and the Madrid sonography enthesitis index (MASEI) score was used. US scores were used to evaluate the elemental lesions of hypoechogenicity, thickness, erosion, calcification, bursitis, and Doppler signal. Disease activity was assessed by Disease Activity Score–C reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).Results: 104 patients with AS and 50 control subjects were included. A total of 5236 entheses were assessed. Compared with the control subjects, only three entheses – the Achilles tendon (AT), sternoclavicular joint (SCJ), and costochondral joint (CCJ) – showed significant differences in the AS group (p < 0.05). Patients with high disease activity (ASDAS-CRP ≥ 2.1) had higher scores than patients with low activity (ASDAS-CRP < 2.1) in erosion (p = 0.02). Patients who were categorized in very high disease activity (ASDAS-CRP ≥ 3.5) had a higher score in erosion (p = 0.02). The erosion score was moderately associated with ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI (r = 0.44, r = 0.21).Conclusions: The commonly involved entheses were the AT, SCJ, and CCJ in AS. Erosion occurred more often in patients with disease activity or high activity. Erosion would be more useful for monitoring disease activity in AS.