BackgroundThe role of multiorgan damage in the mortality caused by ischemic limb injury is still not clarified. The objective of this study was to examine the potential protective effects of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and iloprost (IL) therapy on lung damage induced by limb ischemia/reperfusion injury in a rabbit model, using both biochemical and histopathological aspects.MethodsForty New Zealand white rabbits were randomly allocated into one of five study groups: HBO group (single session of HBO treatment); IL group (25 ng/kg/min infusion of IL); HBO + IL group (both HBO and IL); Control group (0.9% saline only); and a sham group. Acute hind limb ischemia-reperfusion was established by clamping the abdominal aorta for 1 h. HBO treatment and IL infusion were administrated during 60 min of ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion period. Blood pH, partial pressure of oxygen, partial pressure of carbon dioxide and levels of bicarbonate, sodium, potassium, creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, and tumor necrosis factor alpha were determined at the end of the reperfusion period. Malondialdehyde was measured in the plasma and lung as an indicator of free radicals. After sacrifice, left lungs were removed and histopathological examination determined the degree of lung injury.ResultsIn the control group, blood partial pressure of oxygen and bicarbonate levels were significantly lower and creatine kinase, lactate dehydrogenase, malondialdehyde and tumor necrosis factor-α levels were significantly higher than those of the HBO group, IL group, HBO + IL group and sham group. Similarly, the malondialdehyde levels in the lung tissue and plasma levels were significantly lower in the treatment groups compared with the control group. The extent of lung injury according to the histological findings was significantly higher in the control group.ConclusionsThese results suggest that both HBO and IL therapies and their combination might be effectively used in the prevention of lung injury after ischemia/reperfusion injury of the lower extremities.
This study compared the effects of different methods of papaverine application on free blood flow and harvesting time of the internal thoracic artery for coronary bypass grafting. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups of 25 each: group 1 had papaverine injected into the endothoracic tissue around the internal thoracic artery before dissection, group 2 had papaverine injected into the periarterial tissues of the internal thoracic artery pedicle, and group 3 had intraluminal papaverine applied retrogradely into the internal thoracic artery. Mean blood flow was 56.3 +/- 21.3, 21.1 +/- 13.2, and 20.9 +/- 9.1 mL x min(-1) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, immediately after harvesting. Flow in group 1 was significantly better than that in groups 2 and 3. Immediately before anastomosis, mean flow was 89.8 +/- 19.1, 97.6 +/- 35.4, and 95.9 +/- 19.9 mL x min(-1) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, with no significant difference among groups. Internal thoracic artery harvesting times were shorter in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3. Administering papaverine into the endothoracic fascia of the internal thoracic artery bed prior to dissection is a reliable method that facilitates rapid harvesting of the graft without causing trauma and consequent spasm.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.