Despite many years of research into chemical warfare agents, cytotoxic mechanisms induced by mustards are not well understood. Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS) are likely to be involved in chemical warfare agents induced toxicity. These species lead to lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA injury, and trigger many pathophysiological processes that harm the organism. In this article, several steps of pathophysiological mechanisms and possible ways of protection against chemical warfare agents have been discussed. In summary, pathogenesis of mustard toxicity is explained by three steps: (1) mustard binds target cell surface receptor, (2) activates intracellular ROS and RNS leading to peroxynitrite (ONOO(-)) production, and (3) the increased ONOO(-) level damages organic molecules (lipids, proteins, and DNA) leading to poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) activation. Therefore, protection against mustard toxicity could also be performed in these ways: (1) blocking of cell surface receptor, (2) inhibiting the ONOO(-) production or scavenging the ONOO(-) produced, and (3) inhibiting the PARP, activated by ONOO(-) and hydroxyl radical (OH(*)) induced DNA damage. As conclusion, to be really effective, treatment against mustards must take all molecular mechanisms of cytotoxicity into account. Combination of several individual potent agents, each blocking one of the toxic mechanisms induced by mustards, would be interesting. Therefore, variations of combination of cell membrane receptor blockers, antioxidants, nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, ONOO(-) scavengers, and PARP inhibitors should be investigated.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.