Optivate® is a high-purity FVIII/VWF product. Its safety, tolerability and efficacy in subjects ≥ 12 years have been demonstrated. This study was undertaken to assess Optivate® in children with haemophilia A. Twenty-five children, including one PUP (previously untreated patient), aged 1-6 years (mean 4.67 years) were treated with Optivate® for 26 weeks. Inhibitors were assessed every 3 months and viral status at the study start and end. Prophylaxis was used by five boys and on demand by twenty. The mean number of bleeds in the study was lower compared to the same period pre-study (12.0/child vs. 16.2/child), with fewer bleeds (P < 0.05) in the prophylactic subgroup (8.0/child) compared with the on-demand sub-group (13.4/child). Fourteen major bleeds were reported, all by the on-demand sub-group. Children on prophylaxis were administered a mean of 59.4 infusions; on-demand group 35.1 infusions. A total of 998 infusions were used with a mean dose of 29.1 IU kg⁻¹, and a mean of 38.6 exposure days (ED). Children < 4 years used higher doses, and reported fewer bleeds than older children. Children's Parents/Guardians rated Optivate® as helpful or very helpful in controlling 97.5% of bleeds by the prophylactic group, and in 98.5% of the bleeds in the on-demand group. Only 5 of 101 ADRs were treatment-related events (5%), all were mild and non-serious. There were no clinically significant changes in vital signs, viral transmissions or inhibitors. In young children Optivate® was well tolerated, safe and efficacious.

No abstract

No abstract

IntroductionIn 2020, the new nationwide protocol of prophylaxis in Polish plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII) previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe hemophilia A (sHA) was introduced, resulting in the necessity of switching from pdFVIII to recombinant FVIII (octocog-alpha; rFVIII). The study aimed to: (1) assess the safety of switching from pdFVIII to rFVIII, (2) assess the safety and efficacy of pharmacokinetically based (PK-based) personalized prophylaxis in severe hemophilia A.Patients and methods151 children and adolescents receiving prophylaxis with a standard dose (40 U/kg 3 x weekly) of pdFVIII were included in this study. Annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and annualized joint bleeding rate (AJBR) were analyzed for all patients before enrollment. Using myPKFiT application, pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis followed by the selection of the optimal model of prophylaxis was performed in all patients. Two possible models of prophylaxis (standard-dose rFVIII versus PK-based rFVIII) were discussed, with parents leaving the choice to their decision. Parents reported all episodes of bleeds. Screening for inhibitor was performed every 3 months. ABR and AJBR were prospectively analyzed again after a minimum follow-up time of 26 weeks.Results141/151 (93.4%) patients completed the study. 34 patients decided to continue standard prophylaxis with rFVIII (Group I), whereas 107 were switched to PK-based prophylaxis (Group II). The risk of inhibitor development could be assessed in 137/151 (90.7%) patients. Only 2/137 (1.47%) patients (both on PK-based prophylaxis) developed low-titer inhibitor with its spontaneous elimination. The retrospective analysis of bleeds during the last 12 months of standard pdFVIII prophylaxis revealed that patients who decided to continue standard prophylaxis had historically lower ABR and AJBR than those who started PK-based personalized prophylaxis. After a minimum of 26 weeks, ABR and AJBR improved significantly in both groups. There was no significant difference in ABR and AJBR between Group I and Group II during the follow-up period. However, the rate of reduction of ABR and AJBR was higher in patients on PK-based personalized prophylaxis.Conclusion(1) Switching from pdFVIII to rFVIII (octocog-alpha) in PTPs with sHA is safe, (2) PK-based personalized prophylaxis may decrease ABR and AJBR in children and adolescents with sHA.

No abstract