The goal of this work is to identify changes in self and peer evaluations of personality among team members using the Five Factor Model. Multidisciplinary teams of five students in an undergraduate research design project-based course were used to evaluate their own and their peer's personalities over the course of one semester. Results show that team members' evaluations of their own personalities did not change significantly through four iterations. Team member's evaluations of their peers did change for Neuroticism, Agreeableness, and Extraversion.

This paper describes exploratory research regarding leadership and communication within undergraduate engineering design teams. The case study was performed on student design projects of one and two semester duration to begin to assess the impact of project length on leadership and communication within the design teams. Data was collected using a survey that was given to the participants in three capstone design projects in Clemson University’s senior design course. The survey was administered within one month of course and project completion. While there were differences in the communication and leadership patterns between the teams, there were other possible influences beyond the project length such as team size and organization, organizational and geographic distribution, and the nature of the product. As a result, further research is proposed to study leadership and communication structures within undergraduate teams and multi-team systems (MTS).

This research explores the role of personalities in engineering design teams in a capstone course using the Five Factor Model of Personality. Specifically, the self and peer assessed personality profiles are across a semester project. After four iterations, the expectation was that peers would be better able to identify their teammates personality traits. Results show that the peer evaluations do change over time. For the factors of Openness, Conscientiousness, and Agreeableness, the agreement between self and peer evaluations increased from Iteration 2 to Iteration 4. The Extraversion factor agreement increased, but not to the point where the peer and self-evaluations did not have statistically significant differences. The agreement between the self and peer evaluations for Neuroticism decreased over time. Extended results, limitations, and future work are also discussed.