Background: Postoperative pulmonary problems from thoracic procedures are more likely to occur, which may lead to higher morbidity, a longer hospital stay, higher expenses, and a higher fatality rate. Objective: This study was done to compare efficacy of using either individualized or the conventional positive endexpiratory pressure (PEEP) for one-lung ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications. Patients and Methods: This prospective randomized controlled study was done on 116 patients of age between 18 and 70 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II to Ш of either sex who underwent elective thoracic surgeries using one-lung ventilation. Patients were allocated randomly to either conventional PEEP group in which patients underwent thoracic surgeries using conventional PEEP (5 cmH2O) or individualized PEEP group in which patients underwent thoracic surgeries using individualized optimal PEEP which produces the best static lung compliance. Results:The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) was lower in individualized PEEP group (12.1%) compared to conventional PEEP group (34.5%) with p (0.004). The most common complication incidence was lung collapse, which was greater in the conventional PEEP group (10.3%) than in the individualized PEEP group (27.6%). Arterial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio was greater in the individualized compared to conventional PEEP group (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in incidence of pneumonia, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, ARDS, or pulmonary embolism. Conclusion: Using individualized PEEP in patients receiving one-lung ventilation for thoracic surgeries resulted in decreased incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, lower postoperative lung aeration score, better intraoperative respiratory mechanics, and oxygenation with no significant changes in hemodynamics.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.