No abstract

Tissue adhesives have gained increasing use as a possible method of wound closure. We compared the use of 2‐octyl cyanoacrylate (OCA) or subcuticular suture in incisions sutures for the closure of laparoscopic cholecystectomy port incisions. A prospective randomised controlled trial was performed. Patients were randomised to have closure of laparoscopic port sites using either OCA or sutures. Patients were reviewed at 24 hours and returned for follow‐up 1 week and 1 month after postoperatively. At these times, different wound characteristics were documented: Two tools were used to measure the cosmetic result using Hollander wound evaluation scale (HWES) and the patient and observer scar assessment scale (POSAS). A total of 70 patients, 35 in each group were enrolled. The wounds were closed significantly faster in the OCA group (mean 229.16 [±43.7] seconds versus 258.82 [±51.7] seconds, P = .01). Statistically significant difference in favour of using OCA was found for dehiscence (17.1% versus none in the suture group, P = .025) after 1 week. However, no difference was found for wound dehiscence after 1 month. OCA and suture groups did not differ significantly on patient satisfaction. There were no differences in the percentage of wounds achieving optimal scores on the HWES (suture 85.7% versus OCA 74.2%, P = .169). Nerveless, wound evolution was judged to be significantly better in the OCA group using POSAS. Patients' median POSAS was 9.45 (6–11) and 11.43 (10–13) in the OCA and suture groups, respectively (P = .005), and surgeon's median POSAS was 9.42 (6–11) and 11.48 (10–13) in the OCA and suture groups, respectively (P = .006). N‐butyl‐cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive is an acceptable technique for the closure of laparoscopic wounds with less operative time, and cosmetic results are comparable to suturing.

No abstract

IntroductionL’appendicite aigue représente l’urgence chirurgicale la plus fréquente aux urgences. Son diagnostic est avant tout clinique. Cependant, sa présentation clinique parfois trompeuse ainsi que le large éventail de diagnostics différentiels sont fréquemment sources d’erreurs diagnostiques et de retard de prise en charge. Afin de pallier à ces difficultés diagnostiques, de réduire le nombre d’examens complémentaires et d’actes chirurgicaux abusifs, plusieurs scores cliniques ont été ainsi développés, dont le score d’Alvarado. L’objectif de cette étude était d’appliquer ce score à une population de patients adultes venant consulter pour douleurs de la fosse iliaque droite afin d’évaluer ses performances ainsi que ses limites.MéthodesIl s’agissait d’une étude prospective qui a inclus tous les malades âgés de plus de 15 ans se présentant pour douleur de la fosse iliaque droite. Le diagnostic final d'appendicite aigue a été confirmé par examen anatomo-pathologique pour les patients opérés et infirmé lorsque la symptomatologie des patients avait totalement régressé en l'absence de tout traitement.RésultatsNotre étude a inclus 106 patients. Chez les patients dont le score d'Alvarado était inférieur à 4, le diagnostic d'appendicite aigüe n'a jamais été retenu. Les meilleures sensibilités et spécificités ont été retrouvées pour une valeur seuil de 8 pour le score d'Alvarado. Ainsi, avec une bonne sensibilité (81,25%) et une valeur prédictive positive correcte (74,28%), notre étude a démontré que le score d’Alvarado pouvait apporter un bénéfice dans le diagnostic d'appendicite aigüe. Le groupe de patient avec un score strictement inférieur à 4 est considéré comme à faible risque. Les patients dont le score d'Alvarado était strictement supérieur à 6 nécessiteraient une hospitalisation afin, soit d'être opérer d'emblée, soit de compléter par un examen d'imagerie et une surveillance. Le groupe de patient ayant un score compris entre 4 et 6 (limites incluses), reste un groupe où le doute diagnostic est présent et où les examens complémentaires d'imagerie ont un apport certain.ConclusionL’utilisation du score d'Alvarado dans nos urgences permet de rationaliser la prise en charge et d’orienter le diagnostic en limitant la prescription d’explorations radiologiques, le coût de la prise en charge et les actes chirurgicaux abusifs.

Background Little is known about the pattern and appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in patients with acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs). Objective Describe the antibiotics used to treat ARTIs in Tunisian primary care offices and emergency departments (EDs), and assess the appropriateness of their use. Methods It was a prospective multicenter cross-sectional observational clinical study conducted at 63 primary care offices and 6 EDS during a period of 8 months. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescription was evaluated by trained physicians using the medication appropriateness index (MAI). The MAI ratings generated a weighted score of 0 to 18 with higher scores indicating low appropriateness. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and national and institutional standards. The study was approved by the Ethics committee of Monastir Medical Faculty. Results From the 12,880 patients screened we included 9886 patients. The mean age was 47.4, and 55.4% were men. The most frequent diagnosis of ARTI was were acute bronchitis (45.3%), COPD exacerbation (16.3%), tonsillitis (14.6%), rhinopharyngitis (12.2%) and sinusitis (11.5%). The most prescribed classes of antibiotics were penicillins (58.3%), fluoroquinolones (17.6%), and macrolides (16.9%). Antibiotic therapy was inappropriate in 75.5% of patients of whom 65.2% had bronchitis. 65% of patients had one or more antibiotic prescribing inappropriateness criteria as assessed by the MAI. The most frequently rated criteria were with expensiveness (75.8%) and indication (40%). Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and levofloxacin were the most inappropriately prescribed antibiotics. History of cardiac ischemia ([OR] 3.66; 95% [CI] 2.17–10.26; p < 0.001), asthma ([OR] 3.29, 95% [CI] 1.77–6.13; p < 0.001), diabetes ([OR] 2.09, 95% [CI] 1.54–2.97; p = 0.003), history of COPD ([OR] 1.75, 95% [CI] 1.43–2.15; p < 0.001) and age > 65 years (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16–1.58; p < 0.001) were associated with a higher likelihood of inappropriate prescribing. Conclusion Our findings indicate a high inappropriate use of antibiotics in ARTIs treated in in primary care and EDs. This was mostly related to antibiotic prescription in acute bronchitis and overuse of expensive broad spectrum antibiotics. Future interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing in primary care and EDs is needed. Trial registration the trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov registry (NCT04482231).