Velocity based pore pressure prediction methods are widely accepted as a routine technique in the petroleum industry. Despite recent improvements, still, literature suffer from inconsistencies and uncertainties mostly arise from velocity anomalies due to complex lithostratigraphic setting or presence of various formation fluids. The primary goal of this paper is to improve the accuracy and reliability of the conventional Bowers and Tau methods in a reservoir with complex lithology. Our proposed workflow aims to improve the accuracy of the estimations by clustering the input data based on specific petrophysical characteristics. We show since each major zones at the offset test wells have a distinct compaction trend, empirical constants in Bowers and Tau methods can be calibrated for each cluster rather than the whole stratigraphic column. The clustering task was done by statistical analyses of a suite of well logs and validated with core derived lithologies. To find the best clustering algorithm, we applied and compared five techniques namely, K-means, basic sequential algorithmic scheme, single, and complete linkage hierarchical. We found that the self-organizing map (SOM) method provides the best results by maximizing lithology likelihood within each cluster and improve the overall accuracy of the Bowers and Tau methods. This research also aims to provide a systematic comparison of the mentioned clustering algorithms based on their ability in distinguishing various lithofacies. We also try to minimize the user interference in the process of clustering multiple lithofacies and improve the reproducibility of the results and demonstrate the capability of the proposed method through a case study in a reservoir in the Southwest of Iran. Satisfactory results of this study offer a safe ground for implementation of the proposed method in other sedimentary basins.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.