In digital communication and storage systems, the exchange of data is achieved using a communication channel which is not completely reliable. Therefore, detection and correction of possible errors are required by adding redundant bits to information data. Several algebraic and heuristic decoders were designed to detect and correct errors. The Hartmann Rudolph (HR) algorithm enables to decode a sequence symbol by symbol. The HR algorithm has a high complexity, that's why we suggest using it partially with the algebraic hard decision decoder Berlekamp-Massey (BM). In this work, we propose a concatenation of Partial Hartmann Rudolph (PHR) algorithm and Berlekamp-Massey decoder to decode BCH (Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem) codes. Very satisfying results are obtained. For example, we have used only 0.54% of the dual space size for the BCH code (63,39,9) while maintaining very good decoding quality. To judge our results, we compare them with other decoders.

The explosive growth of connected devices demands high quality and reliability in data transmission and storage. Error correction codes (ECCs) contribute to this in ways that are not very apparent to the end user, yet indispensable and effective at the most basic level of transmission. This paper presents an investigation of the performance and analysis of two decoders that are based on hash techniques and syndrome calculation over a Rayleigh channel. These decoders under study consist of two main features: a reduced complexity compared to other competitors and good error correction performance over an additive white gaussian noise (AWGN) channel. When applied to decode some linear block codes such as Bose, Ray-Chaudhuri, and Hocquenghem (BCH) and quadratic residue (QR) codes over a Rayleigh channel, the experiment and comparison results of these decoders have shown their efficiency in terms of guaranteed performance measured in bit error rate (BER). For example, the coding gain obtained by syndrome decoding and hash techniques (SDHT) when it is applied to decode BCH (31, 11, 11) equals 34.5 dB, i.e., a reduction rate of 75% compared to the case where the exchange is carried out without coding and decoding process.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract