Despite the growing body of research that has examined the complex relations in football organisations, one context that has received considerably less attention is the state-led elite sport systems in South Korea. In this article, we examine the interplay between self, affiliation and disaffection within the coaching regime at Suwon University FC (pseudonym), a prestigious school athletic team in South Korea. The precise research methods combined semi-structured interviews and auto-photography. The findings revealed how athletes struggled with the dialectical tension between identification with the coaching context, while also displaying resistant acts that distanced themselves from the organisational practices. Informed by Goffman's concepts of primary and secondary adjustments, the discussion illuminates how athletes exercised their limited agency for self-preservation, despite aligning to the 'totalising' regime. Such work contributes to better understanding the 'underlife' of coaching practice and, more broadly, illustrates the functional complexity between disciplinary structures and agency within coaching practice.
OBJECTIVES This study aims to investigate the effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) on ankle range of motion (ROM) and balance in older women.METHODS The 20 older women with a history of falls participated in the study, and the study subjects were randomly divided into the IASTM group (n=10) and control group (n=10).RESULTS There were no significant interactions between group and time for ankle ROM and functional reach after 8 weeks of IASTM on older women (<i>P</i>>0.05). Meanwhile, there were significant interactions between group and time for one-leg standing and star excursion balance (<i>P</i><0.05), and in particular, the IASTM group had greater improvements compared to the control group.CONCLUSION In conclusion, the regular application of IASTM has been shown to improve the balance of older women with a history of falls.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.