No abstract

No abstract

BACKGROUND To report on the use of percutaneous hydrochloric acid (HCl) enhanced radiofrequency ablation (HRFA) for the treatment of large (maximum diameter ≥ 5 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the caudate lobe. CASE SUMMARY Between August 2013 and June 2016, three patients with a large HCC (maximum diameter: 5.0, 5.7, and 8.1 cm) in the caudate lobe were treated by transarterial chemoembolization followed by computer tomography (CT) guided RFA using a monopolar perfusion RF electrode, which was enhanced by local infusion of 10% HCl at 0.2 mL/min (total volume, 3 to 12 mL). The output power of HRFA reached 100 W, and the average ablation time was 39 min (range, 15 to 60 min). Two patients each underwent one session of HRFA and one patient two sessions. After treatment, CT/magnetic resonance imaging showed that all the three lesions were completely ablated. There was no major complication. Two patients had asymptomatic bile duct dilatation. One patient died of tongue cancer 24 mo after ablation. The remaining two patients were alive and no area of enhancement is detected in the caudate lobe at 28 and 60 mo after ablation, respectively. CONCLUSION Percutaneous CT-guided HRFA is safe and efficacious in treating large HCC in the caudate lobe.

Objectives: To compare sizes and shapes of ablation zones resulting from hydrochloric acid infusion radiofrequency ablation (HRFA) and microwave ablation (MWA), using normal saline infusion radiofrequency ablation (NSRFA) as a control, at a variety of matched power settings and ablation durations, in an ex vivo bovine liver model. Methods: A total of 90 ablation procedures were performed, using each of three modalities: NSRFA, HRFA, and MWA. For each modality, five ablation procedures were performed for each combination of power (80 W, 100 W, or 120 W) and duration (5, 10, 20, 30, 45, or 60 min). The size of ablation zones were compared using ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis test, or generalized linear regression. Results: For ablation durations up to 30 min, mean transverse diameter (TD) after HRFA and MWA did not differ significantly (b ¼ 0.13, p ¼ .20). For ablation durations greater than 30 min, mean TD was significantly larger after HRFA than after MWA (b ¼ 1.657, p < .001). The largest TD (9.46 cm) resulted from HRFA performed with 100 W power for 60 min. Conclusions: Compared to MWA, monopolar HRFA with power settings of 80 W-120 W and durations of less than 30 min showed no significant difference. When duration of more than 30 min, HRFA created larger ablation zones than MWA.