The vast majority of patients possess one or more pharmacogenetic variants that can influence optimal medication use. When pharmacogenetic data are used to guide drug choice and dosing, evidence points to improved disease outcomes, fewer adverse effects, and lower healthcare spending. Although its science is well established, clinical use of pharmacogenetic data to guide drug therapy is still in its infancy. Pharmacogenetics essentially involves the intersection of an individual's genetic data with their medications, which makes pharmacists uniquely qualified to provide clinical support and education in this field. In fact, most pharmacogenetics implementations, to date, have been led by pharmacists as leaders or members of a multidisciplinary team or as individual practitioners. A successful large‐scale pharmacogenetics implementation requires coordination and synergy among administrators, clinicians, informatics teams, laboratories, and patients. Because clinical implementation of pharmacogenetics is in its early stages, there is an urgent need for guidance and dissemination of shared experiences to provide a framework for clinicians. Many early adopters of pharmacogenetics have explored various strategies among diverse practice settings. This article relies on the experiences of early adopters to provide guidance for critical steps along the pathway to implementation, including strategies to engage stakeholders; evaluate pharmacogenetic evidence; coordinate laboratory testing, results interpretation and their integration into the electronic health record; identify reimbursement avenues; educate providers and patients; and maintain a successful program. Learning from early adopters' published experiences and strategies can allow clinicians leading a new pharmacogenetics implementation to avoid pitfalls and adapt and apply lessons learned by others to their own practice.

No abstract

No abstract

Background: The current CHEST guidelines recommend the use of antithrombotic therapy, either aspirin or warfarin, as a primary thromboembolic complications (TECs) prophylaxis in patients who undergo Fontan procedure, without specification on drug selection or duration of therapy. Objective: To investigate the incidence rate of late TECs, occurring after 1-year post–Fontan procedure and to assess the difference in rate of late TECs between warfarin and aspirin. Methods: A retrospective cohort study included patients who had Fontan procedures between 1985-2010 at our institution. Patients were stratified according to the antithrombotic regimen—warfarin, aspirin, or no therapy—at the time of TECs. Results: We screened 499 patients who underwent Fontan procedures; 431 procedures met the inclusion criteria. Over a median follow-up of 13.6 years (IQR= 8.7), freedom from late TECs at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 97.54%, 96.90%, 90.78%, and 88.07%, respectively. There was no difference in late TEC incidence rates per 1000 patient-years between warfarin and aspirin: 7.82 and 5.83 events, respectively; rate ratio= 1.34 (95% CI= 0.68-2.60). Warfarin was associated with a higher major bleeding incidence rate per 1000 patient-years: 3.70 versus 2.91 events with aspirin; rate ratio= 1.27 (95% CI= 0.49 to 3.29). Conclusion and Relevance: The incidence rate of late clinical TECs post–Fontan procedure in our population is low. Warfarin was not superior to aspirin for prevention of late TECs. Yet warfarin was associated with a higher rate of bleeding. This finding suggests a simpler antithrombotic regimen for prevention of TEC after 1-year post-Fontan procedure.