Objectives
The aim of Working Group 3 was to focus on three topics that were assessed using patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs). These topics included the following: (a) the aesthetics of tooth and implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses focusing on partially edentulous patients, (b) a comparison of fixed and removable implant‐retained prostheses for edentulous populations, and (c) immediate versus early/conventional loading of immediately placed implants in partially edentate patients. PROMs include ratings of satisfaction and oral health‐related quality of life (QHRQoL), as well as other indicators, that is, pain, general health‐related quality of life (e.g., SF‐36).
Materials and methods
The Consensus Conference Group 3 participants discussed the findings of the three systematic review manuscripts. Following comprehensive discussions, participants developed consensus statements and recommendations that were then discussed in larger plenary sessions. Following this, any necessary modifications were made and approved.
Results
Patients were very satisfied with the aesthetics of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses and the surrounding mucosa. Implant neck design, restorative material, or use of a provisional restoration did not influence patients’ ratings. Edentulous patients highly rate both removable and fixed implant‐supported prostheses. However, they rate their ability to maintain their oral hygiene significantly higher with the removable prosthesis. Both immediate provisionalization and conventional loading receive positive patient‐reported outcomes.
Conclusions
Patient‐reported outcome measures should be gathered in every clinical study in which the outcomes of oral rehabilitation with dental implants are investigated. PROMs, such as patients’ satisfaction and QHRQoL, should supplement other clinical parameters in our clinical definition of success.
Coblation intracapsular tonsillectomy (ICT) is becoming popular due to its decreased postoperative complications. However, a concern exists about the need for revision surgery. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study, with a null hypothesis that Coblation ICT is not associated with recurrence of the preoperative symptoms, obstructive tonsillar regrowth, or the need for revision tonsillar surgery. We reviewed 345 patients (median age of 4.5 years; IQR 3.2–6.3), operated by the senior author between Feb 2017 and Sep 2020, for a median follow-up of 395.0 days (IQR 221.5–654.5). Most patients had snoring (94.2%), mouth breathing (92.8%), restless sleep (62.6%), and sleep disorder breathing (52.8%); 12.5% had recurrent tonsillitis. The mean initial total symptoms score (TSS) was 5.2 (SD 1.4, range 1–8); 87.5% had three or more symptoms; 86.7% underwent ICT; TSS decreased postoperatively to a mean of 0.2, SD 0.8, range 0–7. The mean hospital stay was 0.96 day (SD 0.36, range 0–3). Secondary bleeding occurred in 0.7% of ICT patients. No patient required admission or intervention. There was no documented tonsillar regrowth resulting in upper airway obstruction. No one needed tonsillar revision surgery. Intracapsular tonsillectomy was shown to be an effective procedure with long-lasting results.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.