Purpose The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic required a shift to electronic devices for education and entertainment, with children more confined to home, which may affect eye growth and myopia. Our goal was to assess behaviors during COVID-19 in myopic and non-myopic children. Methods Parents completed a questionnaire for their children (ages 8.3 ± 2.4 years, n = 53) regarding visual activity in summer 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as during school time and the summer before COVID-19. Children also wore an Actiwatch for 10 days in summer 2020 for objective measures of light exposure, activity, and sleep. Data were analyzed with repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results Subjective measures showed that during COVID-19, children exhibited increased electronic device use and decreased activity and time outdoors ( P < 0.05 for all), while time spent doing near work was not different than during a typical school or summer session before COVID-19 ( P > 0.05). Objective measures during COVID-19 showed that myopic children exhibited lower daily light exposure ( P = 0.04) and less activity ( P = 0.04) than non-myopic children. Conclusions Children demonstrated increased electronic device use and decreased activity and time outdoors during COVID-19, with myopic children exhibiting lower light exposure and activity than non-myopes. Long-term follow-up is needed to understand if these behavioral changes ultimately contribute to myopia progression. Translational Relevance Children's behaviors changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, which may have implications in eye growth and myopia.

SIGNIFICANCEWearable sensors provide the opportunity for continuous objective measurement of the visual environment with high resolution. Our findings show that absolute and temporal properties of near viewing and time outdoors vary between myopic and nonmyopic schoolchildren, which are important considerations when studying refractive error pathogenesis.PURPOSENumerous behavioral factors, including near work, time outdoors, electronic device use, and sleep, have been linked to myopia. The purpose of this study was to assess behaviors using subjective and objective methods in myopic and nonmyopic schoolchildren in the United States.METHODSForty children (aged 14.6 ± 0.4 years) simultaneously wore two sensors for 1 week, a Clouclip for objective measurement of near viewing and light exposure and an Actiwatch for objective measurement of activity and sleep. Parents completed an activity questionnaire for their child. Near-viewing distance, daily duration, short-duration (>1 minute) and long-duration (>30 minutes) near-viewing episodes, light exposure, time outdoors, electronic device use, and sleep duration were analyzed by refractive error group and day of the week.RESULTSObjectively measured daily near-viewing duration was 6.9 ± 0.3 hours. Myopes spent more time in near + intermediate viewing than nonmyopes (P = .008) and had higher diopter hours (P = .03). Short- and long-duration near-viewing episodes were similar between groups (P < .05 for both). Daily light exposure and time outdoors were significantly lower for myopes (P < .05 for both). Electronic device use (12.0 ± 0.7 hours per day) and sleep duration (8.2 ± 0.2 hours per night) were similar between groups (P > .05 for both).CONCLUSIONSObjective and subjective measures confirm that myopic and nonmyopic schoolchildren exhibit different behaviors. Combining wearable sensors with questionnaires provides a comprehensive description of children's visual environment to better understand factors that contribute to myopia.

The purpose of this study was to compare two wearable sensors to each other and to a questionnaire in an adult population. For one week, participants aged 29.2 ± 5.5 years (n = 25) simultaneously wore a Clouclip, a spectacle-mounted device that records viewing distance and illuminance, and an Actiwatch, a wrist-worn device that measures illuminance and activity. Participants maintained a daily log of activities and completed an activity questionnaire. Objective measures of time outdoors, near (10–< 60 cm) and intermediate (60–100 cm) viewing, and sleep duration were assessed with respect to the daily log and questionnaire. Findings showed that time outdoors per day from the questionnaire (3.2 ± 0.3 h) was significantly greater than the Clouclip (0.9 ± 0.8 h) and Actiwatch (0.7 ± 0.1 h, p < 0.001 for both). Illuminance from the Actiwatch was systematically lower than the Clouclip. Daily near viewing duration was similar between the questionnaire (5.7 ± 0.6 h) and Clouclip (6.1 ± 0.4 h, p = 0.76), while duration of intermediate viewing was significantly different between methods (p < 0.001). In conclusion, self-reported time outdoors and viewing behaviors were different than objective measures. The Actiwatch and Clouclip are valuable tools for studying temporal patterns of behavioral factors such as near work, light exposure, and sleep.

The fovea undergoes significant developmental changes from birth into adolescence. However, there is limited data examining cone photoreceptor density, foveal pit shape, and foveal avascular zone (FAZ) size in children. The purpose of this study was to determine whether overall foveal structure differs as a function of age and refractive status in children. Forty-eight healthy children (ages 5.8 to 15.8 years) underwent optical coherence tomography imaging to quantify foveal point thickness and foveal pit diameter, depth, and slope. Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) images of foveal capillaries and cone photoreceptors were acquired in a subset of children to quantify FAZ metrics and cone densities at 0.2, 0.3, and 0.5 mm eccentricities. Results show that foveal pit and FAZ metrics were not related to age, axial length, or refractive status. However, linear cone density was lower in myopic versus non-myopic children at eccentricities of 0.2 mm (mean ± SD = 50,022 ± 5,878 cones/mm2 vs 58,989 ± 4,822 cones/mm2, P < 0.001) and 0.3 mm (43,944 ± 5,547 cones/mm2 vs 48,622 ± 3,538 cones/mm2, P < 0.001). These results suggest FAZ and foveal pit metrics do not systematically differ with age in children, while myopic eyes have decreased linear cone density near the foveal center. Significance Statement: The development of the fovea begins prior to birth and continues through the early teenage years until it reaches adult-like properties. Although the majority of changes during childhood are related to the maturation and migration of cone photoreceptors, in vivo data describing cone packing in children is limited. We assessed overall foveal structure in children as young as 5.8 years old by quantifying cone density and spacing, foveal avascular zone size, and foveal pit morphometry to investigate potential structural differences as a function of age and refractive status. While foveal avascular zone and foveal pit metrics did not significantly differ with age, results indicate that myopic children have lower linear cone densities close to the foveal center compared to non-myopic children.

No abstract