Objectives: Currently, bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) are independently programmed in clinics using frequency allocations based on the relative location of a given electrode from the end of each electrode array. By pairing electrodes based on this method, bilateral CI recipients may have decreased sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITD) and/or interaural level differences (ILD), two cues critical for binaural tasks. There are multiple different binaural measures that can potentially be used to determine the optimal way to pair electrodes across the ears. Previous studies suggest that the optimal electrode pairing between the left and right ears may vary depending on the binaural task used. These studies, however, have only used one reference location or a single bilateral CI user. In both instances, it is difficult to determine if the results that were obtained reflect a measurement error or a systematic difference across binaural tasks. It is also difficult to determine from these studies if the differences between the three cues vary across electrode regions, which could result from differences in the availability of binaural cues across frequency regions. The purpose of this study was to determine if, after experience-dependent adaptation, there are systematic differences in the optimal pairing of electrodes at different points along the array for the optimal perception of ITD, ILD, and pitch. Design: Data from seven bilateral Nucleus users was collected and analyzed. Participants were tested with ITD, ILD, and pitch-matching tasks using five different reference electrodes in one ear, spaced across the array. Comparisons were conducted to determine if the optimal bilateral electrode pairs systematically differed in different regions depending on whether they were measured based on ITD sensitivity, ILD sensitivity, or pitch matching, and how those pairs differed from the pairing in the participants’ clinical programs. Results: Results indicate that there was a significant difference in the optimal pairing depending on the cue measured, but only at the basal end of the array. Conclusion: The results suggest that optimal electrode pairings differ depending on the cue measured to determine optimal pairing, at least for the basal end of the array. This also suggests that the improvements seen when using optimally paired electrodes may be tied to the particular percept being measured both to determine electrode pairing and to assess performance, at least for the basal end of the array.

Bilateral cochlear implant users often have difficulty fusing sounds from the two ears into a single percept. However, measuring fusion can be difficult, particularly with cochlear implant users who may have no reference for a fully fused percept. As a first step to address this, this study examined how localization performance of normal hearing subjects relates to binaural fusion. The stimuli were vocoded speech tokens with various interaural mismatches. The results reveal that the percentage of stimuli perceived as fused was correlated with localization performance, suggesting that changes in localization performance can serve as an indicator for binaural fusion changes.

No abstract

For bilateral cochlear implant users, the left and right arrays are typically not physically aligned, resulting in a degradation of binaural fusion, which can be detrimental to binaural abilities. Perceptually aligning the two arrays can be accomplished by disabling electrodes in one ear that do not have a perceptually corresponding electrode in the other side. However, disabling electrodes at the edges of the array will cause compression of the input frequency range into a smaller cochlear extent, which may result in reduced spectral resolution. An alternative approach to overcome this mismatch would be to only align one edge of the array. By aligning either only the apical or basal end of the arrays, fewer electrodes would be disabled, potentially causing less reduction in spectral resolution. The goal of this study was to determine the relative effect of aligning either the basal or apical end of the electrode with regards to binaural fusion. A vocoder was used to simulate cochlear implant listening conditions in normal hearing listeners. Speech signals were vocoded such that the two ears were either predominantly aligned at only the basal or apical end of the simulated arrays. The experiment was then repeated with a spectrally inverted vocoder to determine whether the detrimental effects on fusion were related to the spectral-temporal characteristics of the stimuli or the location in the cochlea where the misalignment occurred. In Experiment 1, aligning the basal portion of the simulated arrays led to significantly less binaural fusion than aligning the apical portions of the simulated array. However, when the input was spectrally inverted, aligning the apical portion of the simulated array led to significantly less binaural fusion than aligning the basal portions of the simulated arrays. These results suggest that, for speech, with its predominantly low frequency spectral-temporal modulations, it is more important to perceptually align the apical portion of the array to better preserve binaural fusion. By partially aligning these arrays, cochlear implant users could potentially increase their ability to fuse speech sounds presented to the two ears while maximizing spectral resolution.