Interest in farm to early care and education (ECE) programming, which consists of gardening, nutrition education, and local food procurement, has been growing in the United States, as it may be a promising technique for promoting healthful foods to young children. However, there is limited information about current farm to ECE efforts in specific states, including Colorado, to support funding and resource needs. An online survey was distributed to licensed Colorado ECE providers in two phases to understand current participation in the farm to ECE as well as provider perspectives on benefits and barriers to programming. A total of 250 surveys were completed. Approximately 60% of ECE facilities participated in gardening and nutrition education with providers almost unanimously agreeing on the child-centric benefits of programming. Fewer facilities (37%) participated in local food procurement likely due to significant time, cost, and knowledge barriers. To increase participation in farm to ECE as a technique for promoting healthful foods to young children, future efforts should focus on innovative solutions to reduce ECE-specific barriers.

No abstract

No abstract

ObjectivesIt has been well established that cooking method, marbling level, and cooked internal temperature endpoint affect beef flavor, the most important driver of consumer acceptance. However, beef cuts respond differently to cooking method and cooked internal temperature endpoint based on their inherent chemical characteristics.Materials and MethodsTreatments were: beef cuts (inside round, bottom round, and eye of round); USDA beef quality grade (upper two-thirds Choice and Select); cooking methods (pan grill, stir fry, stew no marinade, stew marinade, and roast); and internal cook temperature endpoints (58, 70, and 80°C). The pan grill cook method included 0.25 and 0.75 in samples from each muscle type. The stir fry cook method treatment was limited to 0.25 in cuts, which were cut into 1.00 in strips prior to cooking. The marinated and non-marinated stew cook method treatments included 0.25 and 0.75 in samples from each muscle. These samples were then cut into 0.25 × 1.00 × 1.00 in and 0.75 × 1.00 × 1.00 in samples prior to cooking. Stew marinated samples were marinated with 118 mL water, 90 mL lemon juice, 30 mL canola oil, 5 mL salt, and 2.5 mL pepper. Two lb roasts were cut from bottom round and eye of round subprimals and inside round subprimals were cut into 2.00 in roasts prior to cooking. An expert descriptive beef flavor and texture attribute panel evaluated each sample using 16-point scales for flavor and texture attributes. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) were determined. The trained panel results and WBSF values were analyzed using Proc Means and Proc GLMMIX procedures of SAS (version 9.4, SAS Institute, Cary, NC) with a predetermined α of 5%.ResultsQuality grade impacted flavor for the inside round (P < 0.05). USDA quality grade had minimal effect on tenderness as expected, as beef round cuts are highly active muscles in the animal and contain considerable amounts of connective tissue. Cooking method and internal cook temperature endpoint, or cooking time for the stewing cooking treatment, impacted beef flavor to a greater extent (P < 0.05). When pan fried, thicker cuts resulted in more positive flavor attributes. For cuts that were roasted, cooking to higher internal temperatures resulted in higher levels of beef identity, roasted, and umami flavors and less serumy/bloody flavors, as well as decreased tenderness (P < 0.0001), especially in inside round roasts. Marinated round cuts were more tender than their non-marinated counterparts (P < 0.0001). Cuts that were thinner and had longer cooking times were more tender but had more off-flavor attributes (P < 0.05).ConclusionCut thickness, cooking method, length of cooking or internal cook temperature endpoint, and presence of marinade affected flavor and texture of bottom round, eye of round, and inside round cuts. This data will be useful in providing consumer and food service personnel recommendation on how to maximize the flavor and texture of beef round cuts.

Objectives Vitamin K is an essential nutrient that has been implicated in cardiovascular disease and other chronic diseases. There are two forms of vitamin K in nature. Phylloquinone (PK) is plant-based and has been well-quantified in the U.S. diet. Menaquinones (MK) are found in animal products and fermented food. However, the MK contents of food have not been well characterized. The objectives of this study were to: 1) quantify the different forms of MK (MK4 through MK13) in the beef variety meat items; and 2) determine if cooking has an effect on vitamin K content of beef variety meat items. Methods Raw beef heart, liver, kidney, tongue, honeycomb tripe, oxtail, bone marrow, beef rocky mountain oysters (RMO), fat composite samples and blood (total samples n = 31) were obtained from processing facilities in the U.S., to provide national representation of retail-ready beef variety meat items. All raw beef samples were cooked, and final internal temperature was 80 °C. PK and the MKs in raw and cooked beef variety meat items were quantified using mass spectrometry technology. Wilcoxon Rank Signed test was used to compare PK and MK contents of raw and cooked samples. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. Results The highest concentration of any form was PK in bone marrow at 152 ± 11.9 ng/g. The fat composite samples contained between 20.9 ng/g to 63.0 ng/g of PK. Modest amounts of PK were found in liver, RMO and tripe. MKs were present in all samples analyzed with MK4, MK10, MK12 and MK13 present in the largest amount in the analyzed samples. MK4 concentrations in bone marrow and fat composite samples were 341 ± 116 and 374 ± 101 ng/g, respectively. Liver contained appreciable amounts of longer-chain MKs, primarily in the forms of MK11, MK12 and MK13, which together accounted for 95% of total vitamin K in liver. There were no significant differences in total vitamin K content between cooked and uncooked beef variety. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of MK contents of U.S. beef variety meat items. The vitamin K content of beef items were not influenced by cooking (heating). Funding Sources Funded by the Beef Checkoff and supported by the USDA, Agricultural Research Service under Cooperative Agreement.