Background: Sarcopenia has been identified as a prognostic factor among certain types of cancer. In esophageal cancer, patients are at increased risk of malnutrition and sarcopenia, ultimately contributing to poor outcomes. A systematic review was conducted to determine whether sarcopenia, defined by the skeletal muscle index, is predictive of overall survival, disease-free survival, and postoperative complications in resectable esophageal cancer. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines up until January 2021. The primary outcome was overall survival; secondary outcomes included disease-free survival, pulmonary complications, and anastomotic leak. Results: Twenty-one studies (4 prospective; 17 retrospective; 3966 patients) were included. Sarcopenia was present in 1940 (48.1%) patients and was associated with lower overall survival [hazard ratio (HR): 1.56; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-1.95; P < 0.00001; I 2 = 71%] and disease-free survival (HR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.04-2.87; P = 0.03; I 2 = 51%). A decrease in skeletal muscle index, independent of sarcopenia status, was associated with lower overall survival (HR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.20-2.73; P = 0.005; I 2 = 92%). Sarcopenia was associated with increased odds of pulmonary complications (odds ratio: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.29-2.66; P = 0.0008; I 2 = 41%) and increased odds of anastomotic leak (odds ratio: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.11-1.93; P = 0.008; I 2 = 0%). Conclusions: Sarcopenia is a predictor of overall survival, disease-free survival, and postoperative complications in patients with resectable esophageal cancer. Studies on the modifiability of sarcopenia in the preoperative period will help determine the utility of nutritional interventions.

Background The phenomenon of lung cancer stigma has been firmly established in the literature. However, studies have predominantly focused on patients with advanced disease, whose experiences may differ from patients with earlier stage, surgically resectable lung cancer and an improved prognosis. Purpose The objective of the study was to examine the stigma experienced in a Canadian population with early-stage, resectable lung cancer. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer were enrolled at a tertiary thoracic surgery clinic. The 25-item Lung Cancer Stigma Inventory (LCSI) was self-administered by patients to quantitatively measure experiences of lung cancer stigma. LCSI results informed the development of a semi-structured focus group and individual interviews. Results Of the 53 participants completing the survey, 38 (72%) met established LCSI score threshold, indicating a clinically meaningful level of stigma. No significant relationship was found between total LCSI scores and any demographic variable. Analysis of qualitative data revealed multiple themes related to experiences of lung cancer stigma. The major themes were classified into four categories: impact of the association between lung cancer and smoking, societal attitudes and assumptions, personal choices in relation to diagnosis, and experiences related to care. Conclusions A surgical population of patients with predominantly early-stage lung cancer experienced lung cancer stigma at a high incidence and a level similar to previously studied populations with more advanced disease. The qualitative results support the quantitative findings that respondents experienced more internal stigma than either perceived stigma from others or constrained disclosure related to their diagnosis.

Sarcopenia measured through body composition analysis is emerging as an important prognosticator among various malignancies, including oesophageal cancer. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) as determined by the third lumbar vertebrae on cross‐sectional CT images has been demonstrated as a predictor of overall survival in oesophageal cancer, using pre‐defined cut off values for sarcopenia. However, this is largely within the setting of resectable disease. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to determine the effect of sarcopenia defined by SMI on overall‐survival in patients with unresectable oesophageal cancer. On 30 January 2021, a systematic search of the literature was conducted to identify the role of SMI among patients with unresectable oesophageal cancer, with overall survival as the primary outcome. Databases included MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Inclusion criteria included age >18, diagnosis of oesophageal cancer, and non‐operative management. A meta‐analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 using an inverse variance, random effects model. After the removal of duplicates, 2755 unique search results were obtained. Manual screening of titles and abstracts resulted in 287 full text articles that were reviewed. Of these, five studies met the inclusion criteria with data evaluating the effect of sarcopenia defined by SMI on overall survival. A total of 783 patients, the majority of which were male (n = 638, 81%), with a mean age of 68 ± 2.3 years were included. 641 (82%) patients were diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma. Sarcopenia, as determined by SMI using pre‐defined cut‐off values, was reported in 517 patients (66%). Meta‐analysis demonstrated decreased overall survival in the sarcopenia group compared with the non‐sarcopenia group (HR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.21–1.89; P = 0.0003; I2 = 0%; Figure 1). No significant publication bias was noted on assessment of funnel plot and Egger's test (P = 0.295). Sarcopenia as defined by SMI is predictive of overall survival among patients with nonoperative oesophageal cancer. Further analysis on the effect of sarcopenia on treatment related adverse effects and complications, particularly related to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and oesophageal stenting, is needed to identify the degree of prognostication offered by body composition analysis. Studies on the modifiability of sarcopenia will help determine the utility of nutritional interventions.

No abstract

Operative classification of ventral abdominal hernias: new and practical classification. Yasser Selim. From the Ministry of Health.Background: Ventral hernias of the abdomen are defined as a noninguinal, nonhiatal defect in the fascia of the abdominal wall. Unfortunately, there is not currently a universal classification system for ventral hernias. One of the more accepted classification systems is that of the European Hernia Society (EHS). Its limitation is that it does not include individual patient risk factors and wound classification. The aim of this work was to find out the basic principles of hernia etiology and pathogenesis, clarify the factors that are important in treatment of ventral hernias, and categorize hernia patients according to those factors. Methods: This retrospective study included 238 patients who presented to our surgery department between 2010 and 2020. A full description of ventral hernias was made, including their type according to the EHS. In addition, abdominal wall components were assessed, including strength of rectus muscles, lateral abdominal muscles, and abdominal fascia, namely the linea alba. Patients with spontaneous hernias were grouped according to the size of the defect and the condition of the rectus abdominis muscles, the fascia and other abdominal muscles. Results: Patients were put into 6 clinical categories: type 1A, type 1B, type 2, type 3, type 4, and type 5. The grouping of patients was done according to the factors we believed affect the choice of surgical procedure and the prognosis of repair. Patients with types 1 and 2 have normal abdominal muscles, whereas those with types 3 and 4 have weak muscles and weak stretched fascia (linea alba). Type 5 includes incisional hernias. Conclusion: The primary purpose of any classification should be to improve the possibility of comparing different studies and their results. By describing hernias in a standardized way, different patient populations can be compared. Numerous classifications for groin and ventral hernias have been proposed over the past 5-6 decades. For primary abdominal wall hernias, there was agreement with EHS classification on the use of localization and size as classification variables.