Osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative joint disease characterized by loss of articular cartilage, inflammation and pain, which sometimes necessitates total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Profiling biomarkers of cartilage degradation and inflammation is a promising area of research to understand the pathogenesis of OA. This study aims to report the post-operative fluctuations of 3 biomarkers of OA, osteopontin (OPN), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and ADAMTS4 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs 4), in patients undergoing TJA to further define the interaction among these biomarkers and delineate their role in OA pathogenesis. OPN is an extracellular matrix (ECM) glycoprotein with increased activity in OA and joint damage and is upregulated by either inflammation or cleavage by MMPs and thrombin. MMP-9 is known to cleave OPN and is upregulated by inflammatory markers, such as IL-1, IL-6 and CRP. ADAMTS4 is an enzyme that degrades aggrecan, a major component of cartilage. These biomarkers were measured in deidentified blood samples collected on the day of surgery, 1 day post-operatively, and day 5-7 post-operatively. MMP-9 and OPN levels were significantly elevated at all times, and ADAMTS4 was significantly decreased at baseline versus controls. OPN and ADAMTS4 inversely fluctuated post-operatively, indicating an interrelation between these 2 biomarkers. This study suggests that the upregulation of MMP-9 and therefore OPN then results in the downregulation of ADAMTS4. The relationship between OPN and thrombin also highlights the importance of monitoring for thrombotic complications. These biomarkers, along with thrombin-mediated cleavage products, may be helpful in the prognostic management of OA patients.

No abstract

Purpose:Assessing trainees’ surgical proficiency is an important aspect of urological surgical training. The current standard is the Urology Milestone Project, initially implemented in 2013. This evaluation is limited in that it contains only 3 questions on surgical competency per surgical modality with assessments occurring semi-annually without real-time operative feedback. However, since the Urology Milestones Project’s inception a plethora of competency-based surgical assessment tools have been described. We aim to perform a comprehensive review of the literature of these available tools and analyze their strengths and weaknesses as a way of providing a repository of available assessment strategies for further development of a more comprehensive and standardized assessment tool.Materials and Methods:A review of the primary literature was performed using key words such as “surgical assessment tools urology,” “surgical assessment tools prostate,” “bladder surgical assessment tools,” “renal surgical assessment tools urology,” and “surgical assessment tools urology task specific.” Technical and nontechnical skill assessments were included. One reviewer identified and analyzed studies that published assessment tools for use in surgical and urological training.Results:A total of 1,497 articles published between 1997-2022 were identified. Of these, 34 met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen (52.9%) were specialty nonspecific and 16 (47.1%) were specific for urological training. Of the 18 tools developed for general surgical principles, 12 (66.7%) had some form of validity, 9 (50.0%) were significantly reliable, and 2 (11.1%) were externally validated. Of the 16 tools developed specifically for use in urology training, 13 (81.3%) had some form of validity, 7 (43.8%) were significantly reliable, and none were externally validated. Of these 16 tools, 12 (75.0%) were procedure-specific and 4 (25.0%) were developed for general use in endourological procedures.Conclusions:Surgical training is evolving toward a competency-based model, as evidenced by the increase in assessment tools created within the past 10 years. These instruments not only provide objective feedback to trainees, but also monitor progression. However, they are heterogeneous in construct and utilization. There remains a need for the adoption of a standardized, valid, and reliable tool, ie, both procedure-specific and generalizable across multiple procedures for use in urology training.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic condition marked by joint pain, inflammation and loss of articular cartilage, that can be treated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA) at end stages. TJA is marked by post-operative inflammation, which directly effects levels of cartilage degradation biomarkers, proteoglycan-4 (PRG4) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). PRG4 is a protective glycoprotein that is decreased in individuals with OA. MMP-9 is a matrix metalloproteinase that contributes to articular cartilage loss and is elevated in OA patients. It is upregulated by pro-inflammatory markers, such as IL-1, IL-6 and CRP. This study aims to elucidate the immediate post-operative changes in levels of PRG4, MMP-9, IL-6, CRP, and WBC in patients undergoing TJA to clarify the role of inflammation in recovery after surgery and in the overall pathogenesis of OA. Blood was collected at 3 time points (day 0, day 1 post-operatively, and days 5-7 post-operatively), from 63 patients undergoing TJA due to OA, and levels of these biomarkers were quantified. IL-6, CRP, WBC and MMP-9 were lowest at day 0, highest at day 1, and stabilized at an intermediate level at days 5-7. Meanwhile, PRG4 followed the opposite trend. These studies suggest that IL-6, CRP and WBC showed predictable fluctuations, with pro-inflammatory biomarkers upregulating MMP-9 and downregulating PRG4. Measuring these biomarkers may help expose the role of inflammation in the post-surgical recovery of TJA patients and in long-term pathogenesis of OA. These levels may help risk stratify patients pre-operatively and help develop individualized post-surgical plans.

No abstract