I argue that Friedrich Hölderlin's theoretical texts are marked by a paradox: namely, Hölderlin attempts to achieve in them the work of unification he assigns to poetry alone. This unification is his specifically post‐Kantian response to a more general worry about the linking of mind and world. Hölderlin understands that the desire for unification within and between human subjects and the external world is a fundamental anthropological tendency even as the desire remains unfulfillable. I draw out thematic and metatextual features of Hölderlin's theoretical texts that show him making a strong distinction between poetic and theoretical language; engaging with problems of the connection between mind and world; and, finally, attempting to perform the unifications he denies discursive language in the theoretical texts themselves. I close the article with a reading of the late poem “Lebensalter” to show that, for Hölderlin, poetry can effect unifications that theory cannot.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.