This paper reports data from the Danish in-vitro fertilization (IVF) registry from 1994 to 1995 including data on treatments and the results of these (perinatal outcome, cytogenetic findings and fetal malformations) in comparison with a control group matched for maternal age, parity, multiplicity and year of birth. There were 1756 deliveries of 2245 children (24.3% twins, 1.8% triplets). The rate of prematurity among IVF children was 23.8% (NS) [singletons 7. 3% (P < 0.05), twins 41.2% and triplets 93.5%], 23.6% weighed <2500 g [singletons 7% (P < 0.05), twins 42.2% and triplets 87.1%]. The perinatal mortality rate was 21.8 in the study group compared to 17. 4 in the control group (NS). In total, 13.2% of all clinical pregnancies and 15.4% of the pregnancies that resulted in a delivery had a prenatal genetic examination. Of all examined, 3.5% had an abnormal karyotype. In total, 107 (4.8%) children in the study group and 103 (4.6%) in the control group were born with malformations (NS), compared to 2.8% in the background population. Our results indicate that it is the characteristics of the patients and multiplicity of pregnancy, rather than the assisted reproductive technology that determines the fetal risks of IVF pregnancies compared to the background population.
The randomized controlled trials on umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry show major differences regarding study design and technical and clinical issues and, therefore, they should not be pooled in a simple meta-analysis. By stratification it was found that only in pregnancies with suspected intrauterine growth restriction and/or hypertensive disease of pregnancy will the use of umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry reduce the number of perinatal deaths and unnecessary obstetric interventions.
Introduction
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are serious complications to vaginal delivery causing anal incontinence in 50% of the women in the long term. In Norway, the incidence of OASIS has been significantly reduced from 4%‐5% to 1%‐2% after implementation of prevention programs focusing on perineal protection. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether implementation of formal prevention programs was associated with a reduced incidence of OASIS over time.
Material and methods
We performed a historical cohort study, evaluating incidence, change of incidence and risk factors of OASIS during the years 2011‐2015 at the four delivery departments in the Capital Region of Denmark. Two of the four departments implemented formal prevention programs in 2012‐2013. We performed trend tests and uni‐ and multivariable analyses, adjusting for important risk factors and calculating interactions between risk factors.
Results
There were 75 173 vaginal deliveries during the study period; of those, 2670 (3.6%) were complicated by OASIS. The incidence of OASIS decreased during the study period from 4.3% (n = 636) in 2011 to 2.6% (n = 399) in 2015. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of OASIS at both the departments with formal prevention programs and those without. After adjustment for other important risk factors of OASIS, we found no significant difference in the risk reduction between departments with and without formal prevention programs.
Conclusions
We found that the general focus on prevention of OASIS in Denmark was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of OASIS, but implementation of formal prevention programs did not lead to a further reduction. It is possible that more rigorous interventions at the hospitals with formal prevention programs could have resulted in a significant difference in incidence of OASIS.
Transfer of three embryos did not result in higher pregnancy rates as compared to transfer of two embryos. The first data from the Danish IVF Registry support data from other registries regarding treatment, pregnancy outcome and complications during pregnancy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.