A compilation of phytoplankton species abundance data from the spring bloom along the northern Norwegian coast and in the Barents Sea shows that the quantitatively most important species are the prymnesiophyte Phaeocystis pouchetii and the common cold water to temperate diatoms Chaetoceros socialis, Skeletonema costatum sensu lato, Fragilariopsis oceanica, Thalassiosira spp., Chaetoceros furcellatus, Chaetoceros compressus, Chaetoceros debilis and Bacterosira bathyomphala. The relative abundance of diatoms and Phaeocystis varied highly and apparently stochastically between years. P. pouchetii occurred during all stages of the spring bloom and sometimes completely dominated the phytoplankton community. Along the Norwegian coast, the importance of P. pouchetii increased northwards. The species composition in coastal fjords at 70°N is surprisingly similar to that of shelf waters in the Barents Sea (up to 80°N). An exception is S. costatum sensu lato which was seldom observed in Arctic waters. Small flagellates (<10 µm) other than dinoflagellates and P. pouchetii are also important among the Barents Sea spring phytoplankton. Associations of species seem rigid over time and are dominated by C. socialis and P. pouchetii in northern waters. Biogeographical categories of spring bloom species in relation to environmental conditions are discussed.

The phytoplankton in the tjords of West Spitzbergen was invcstigated from 197ti to l9ti-5. The spring bloom lasted longer than at the Norwegian coast: from mid March to carly June. Thcre is no delay in the onser of the spring bloom in Spitzerbergen fjords relative to fjords of northern Norway. This is probably related to the rapid daylength increasc at high latitudes. Thc phytoplankton species composition during spring u'as comparablc to that along the coast of northcrn N

Isolates of five pelagic North Atlantic marine diatoms (Bacillariophyceae): Attheya longicornis, Chaetoceros socialis, Chaetoceros furcellatus, Skeletonema marinoi and Porosira glacialis were cultivated in large photobioreactors at two light and two temperature regimes to test if this affected bioactivity. We screened for bioactivity in assays representing five different therapeutic areas: diabetes II (PTP1b), cancer (melanoma cells, A2058), anti-oxidants (FRAP), immunomodulation (TNFa) and anti-infection (MRSA, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). All the diatom strains showed activity in two or more assays. We detected differences in bioactivity both between species and within species cultivated with different light and temperature regimes. Our results demonstrate the potential for a more exhaustive exploitation of diatom metabolites that can be obtained by manipulation of the cultivation conditions.

No abstract

No abstract