Introduction: The prevalence of urinary incontinence increases with age. Especially in nursing homes people often do not only suffer from incontinence, in addition they present comorbidities, i.e. dementia or loss of mobility. In this study we assessed the severity of urinary incontinence and comorbidities of nursing home residents. Methods: We included 81 residents of nursing homes who underwent recordings of medical history, physical examination and ultrasound diagnostic of the urinary tract. Grading of urinary incontinence was assessed by the amount of pads used daily. Severity of immobility, dementia and malnutrition was assessed. Further examinations were urinalysis by dip stick and microbiological testing, geriatric depression scale, and QLQ-C30. Results: We found incontinence at different degrees present at 67/81 (83%) of nursing home residents. We could show, that more severe incontinence correlated with worse nutritional status (r = 0.53, p < 0.0001), increase in demential symptoms (r = 0.37, p = 0.0012) and worse mobility r = 0.71, p < 0.0001). There was no correlation for the severity of urinary incontinence with the prevalence of diabetes, intake of diuretics or the presence of urinary tract infections. Conclusions: Worsening of nutritional status, cognitive function and mobility not only correlate with the prevalence but also with the severity of urinary incontinence.
Background: Depressive syndromes that do not comply with the diagnostic criteria for specific depressive disorders are designated as ‘subclinical’ or ‘subsyndromal’ depressive syndromes. Using our own data from a clinical study, this paper outlines the significance of subclinical depressive syndromes and demonstrates the problems of differentiating between depressive and subclinical depression (SD) syndromes and organic mood disorders especially in an elderly population with medical comorbidity. Methods: Two hundred and sixty-two patients aged 60 years and older in a general hospital were investigated, using a clinical psychiatric interview, expert ratings and self-report scales after extensive internal medical diagnostic evaluation. Results: When, without further differentiation as to their origin, all symptoms required by symptom checklists according to ICD-10 were considered for the diagnosis of major depression (MD), 35.5% of the study participants fulfilled the diagnostic criteria. After differentiating for etiology of symptoms, MD was found in only 14.1%, SD was diagnosed in 17.6% and organic mood disorder in 12.2% of the study participants. In another 41 patients (15.6%), symptoms of depression not fulfilling ICD-10 criteria were classified as being of organic or drug-induced origin. SD patients were in a mean position between nondepressive and depressive patients with regard to social isolation and physical impairment; women were overrepresented in the depressive and subdepressive groups. Conclusions: SD and organic mood disorder are common and helpful diagnostic categories in the elderly. The results show that in old age there is substantial danger of confounding MD, SD and organic mood disorder, thus leading to erroneously high prevalence rates of MD and underestimations of organic mood disorder if depressive symptoms are recorded only by self-report scales or a symptom checklist. Both internal and psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic competence as well as a liaison service in general hospitals are necessary for the differential diagnosis of MD, SD and organic mood disorder in the elderly with medical comorbidity.
Due to the complex nature of cognitive and psychosocial interventions, their efficacy depends strongly on local settings. Thus, active components of these interventions are not always obvious, even in controlled randomized trials. Successful patient management includes (i) the safekeeping of basic support, (ii) the provision of a stable external milieu that is adjusted to the patients' cognitive resources and (iii) the provision of multimodal therapeutic concepts that are closely adapted to the practical needs of the patients and caregivers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.