thrombocytopenia in post-cardiac surgery patients is rarely due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, even when antibody tests are positive. See also Gruel Y, Pouplard C. Post-operative platelet count profile: the most reliable tool for identifying patients with true heparin-induced thrombocypenia after cardiac surgery. This issue, pp 27-9.Summary. Background: The high frequency of thrombocytopenia in post-cardiac surgery patients makes it challenging to diagnose heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Two platelet count profiles are reported as indicating possible HIT in these patients: profile 1 describes a platelet count fall that begins between postoperative days 5 and 10, whereas profile 2 denotes early-onset thrombocytopenia that persists beyond day 5. Objectives: Toexaminehowthese platelet count profiles correlate withantibodystatusandHITpost-cardiacsurgery.Methods:We prospectively screened 581 cardiac surgery patients for heparindependent antibodies by platelet factor 4 (PF4)-heparin immunoassay and platelet-activation test, and performed daily platelet counts (until day 10) with 30-day follow-up. Results: All three patients with platelet count profile 1 tested positive for platelet-activating anti-PF4-heparin IgG antibodies [odds ratio (OR) 521.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9-34 000, P = 0.002], and were judged to have HIT. In contrast, none of 25 patients with early-onset and persisting thrombocytopenia (profile 2) was judged to have HIT, including five patients testing positivefor platelet-activating anti-PF4-heparin IgG antibodies. In these patients, the frequency of heparin-dependent antibodies didnot differfromthat in non-thrombocytopeniccontrols, either for anti-PF4-heparin IgG (OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.7-4.1, P = 0.31) or for platelet-activating antibodies (OR 1.9, 95% CI 0.6-5.7, P = 0.20). Multivariate analysis revealed that type of cardiac surgery, but not HIT antibody status, predicted early-onset and persisting thrombocytopenia. Together, these findings show that HIT was uncommon in this study population [overall frequency, 3/581 (0.5%), 95% CI 0.1-1.5%]. Conclusions: Thrombocytopenia that begins between 5 and 10 days post-cardiac surgery is highly predictive for HIT. In contrast, early-onset and persisting thrombocytopenia is usually caused by non-HIT factors with coinciding heparin-dependent antibody seroconversion.

patients requiring prolonged intensive care unit treatment after cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 428-35.Summary. Background: The diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is problematic in postcardiac surgery (CS) intensive care unit (ICU) patients, as there are multiple potential explanations for thrombocytopenia and the presence of anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies is not highly specific for HIT. Two platelet count profiles for HIT -a 40% or greater fall in platelet count beginning on or after day 5 (pattern 1) and persisting thrombocytopenia (< 100 · 10 9 L -1 ) beyond day 7 (pattern 2) -have been described in post-CS patients. Methods and results: We examined the platelet count profiles of 329 consecutive post-CS patients who required ICU treatment beyond 7 days. Although 70 patients (21.3%) developed thrombocytopenia (57.1% pattern 1, 42.9% pattern 2), the overall incidence of HIT was only 1.8% [6/329; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.7-3.9%] in these ICU patients, with more HIT patients showing a pattern 2 than a pattern 1 platelet count decrease (four vs. two patients). Notably, pattern 2 patients with HIT also showed a new proportional fall of > 30% in platelet count between postoperative days 5 and 10. Among the remaining 2242 post-CS patients without a prolonged ICU stay, only three (0.1%; 95% CI 0.03-0.4%) developed symptomatic HIT (OR 0.07; 95% CI 0.01-0.3; P = 0.0002 vs. ICU patients), all presenting with pattern 1. Conclusions: Among post-CS ICU patients, a postoperative platelet count fall between days 5 and 10 increases diagnostic specificity for HIT, irrespective of whether this platelet count fall occurs after postoperative platelet count recovery (pattern 1) or is superimposed upon persisting postoperative thrombocytopenia (pattern 2). A prospective study is required in order to validate the findings of this retrospective analysis.

No abstract

No abstract

Observations among Karlsburg patients in 2006 revealed that the majority of very low platelet levels inducing postoperative heparin-induced-thrombocytopenia (HIT)-diagnostics with at the end negative results appeared related to aortic valve replacement (AVR) with stentless bioprostheses. We compared the postoperative courses of platelet counts in patients having had AVR with stentless prostheses (Sorin Biomedica Freedom Solo [SOLO]) or stented prostheses (Carpentier Edwards Perimount [PM]). Between February 2005 and April 2007, 209 patients received AVR with SOLO, in 137 patients a PM-prosthesis was implanted. The mean platelet levels were compared from the first up to the fifth postoperative day. A higher occurrence of platelet levels below 100 Gpt/l between the second and the fifth postoperative day was found in the SOLO-group (71.9%) compared with the other biological substitute PM (36.6%). Differences in platelet counts between SOLO- and PM-subgroups were measured for day 2 (P=0.03), day 3 (P=0.0004) day 4 (P=0.0007), day 5 (P=0.0002) and at discharge (P<0.0001). Following intervention with conventional biological AVR, differences in the postoperative recovery of platelet counts can be detected, depending on the prosthesis used. The causes for and the clinical implications of this phenomenon are not yet assessed.