Antiglutamatergic treatment reduced clinical deterioration in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease, a phase associated with distress for patients and burden on caregivers, for which other treatments are not available.

The efficacy of memantine in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has been investigated in multiple randomised, placebo-controlled phase III trials. Recently, the indication label for memantine in Europe was extended to cover patients with moderate to severe AD, i.e. Mini-Mental State Exam total scores below 20. The efficacy data for memantine in this patient subgroup has been summarised by a meta-analysis of 1,826 patients in six trials. Efficacy was assessed using measures of global status (Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus Caregiver Input), cognition (Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale – Cognitive Subscale, or Severe Impairment Battery), function (Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living 19- or 23-item scale), and behaviour (Neuropsychiatric Inventory). Results (without replacement of missing values) showed statistically significant effects for memantine (vs. placebo) in each domain. Memantine was well tolerated, and the overall incidence rates of adverse events were comparable to placebo. This meta-analysis supports memantine’s clinically relevant efficacy in patients with moderate to severe AD.

The aim of the reported trial was to investigate the safety and efficacy of memantine in mild to moderate vascular dementia (VaD). This was a 28-week, double-blind, parallel, randomized controlled trial of memantine 20 mg daily versus placebo which was conducted in 54 centres in the UK. Memantine is a uncompetitive, moderate affinity N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist. Patients with a diagnosis of probable VaD and Mini Mental State Examination total scores between 10 and 22 were eligible for inclusion. Primary efficacy parameters were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog) and the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C). A total of 579 patients were randomized and 548 patients with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment qualified for the intent-to-treat analysis. At endpoint, memantine was shown to improve cognition relative to placebo in VaD: the change of ADAS-cog from baseline differed by a mean of -1.75 points (95% confidence intervals -3.023 to -0.49) and a median of 2 points between the two groups, while CGI-C ratings showed no significant differences between treatment groups. A total of 77% of all memantine-treated patients experienced adverse event, versus 75% of the placebo-treated patients, dizziness being the most frequent adverse event (11% versus 8%, respectively). Memantine was well tolerated and safe.

The involvement of glutamate mediated neurotoxicity in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease is finding increasingly more acceptance in the scientific community. Central to this hypothesis is the assumption that in particular glutamate receptors of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) type are overactivated in a tonic rather than a phasic manner. Such continuous mild activation leads under chronic conditions to neuronal damage. Moreover, one should consider that impairment of plasticity (learning) may result not only from neuronal damage per se but also from continuous activation of NMDA receptors. To investigate this possibility we tested whether overactivation of NMDA receptors using either non-toxic doses/concentrations of a direct NMDA agonist or through an indirect approach--decrease in magnesium concentration--produces deficits in plasticity. In fact NMDA both in vivo (passive avoidance test) and in vitro (LTP in CA1 region) impaired learning and synaptic plasticity. Under these conditions memantine which is an uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist with features of "improved magnesium" (voltage dependence, affinity) attenuated the deficit. The more direct proof that memantine can act as a surrogate for magnesium was obtained in LTP experiments under low magnesium conditions. In this case as well, impaired LTP was restored in the presence of therapeutically relevant concentrations of memantine (1 microM). In vivo, doses leading to similar brain/serum levels produce neuroprotection in animal models relevant for neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease such as neurotoxicity produced by inflammation in the NBM or beta-amyloid injection to the hippocampus. Hence, we postulate that if in Alzheimer's disease overactivation of NMDA receptors occurs indeed, memantine would be expected to improve both symptoms (cognition) and slow down disease progression because it takes over the physiological function of magnesium.

Background: This study is an extension of a 28-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of memantine in 252 patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease.Objective: To evaluate long-term memantine treatment in moderate to severe Alzheimer disease.Design, Setting, and Patients: Open-label, 24-week extension trial. Raters remained blind to the patients' initial study treatment. Patients (n=175) were enrolled from the previous double-blind study in an outpatient setting.Intervention: Twenty mg of memantine was given daily. Main Outcome Measures:Efficacy assessments from the double-blind study were continued and safety parameters were monitored.Results: Patients who switched to memantine treatment from their previous placebo therapy experienced a significant benefit in all main efficacy assessments (functional, global, and cognitive) relative to their mean rate of decline with placebo treatment during the double-blind period (PϽ.05). The completion rate for the extension phase of the study was high (78%) and the favorable adverse event profile for memantine therapy was similar to that seen in the double-blind study.Conclusion: These results extend previous findings that demonstrated the efficacy and safety of memantine in the treatment of patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease.