Background: In patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) who are at risk of sudden cardiac death, a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator (WCD) is recommended as a bridge to the recovery of LVEF or as a bridge to the implantation of a device. In addition to its function to detect and treat malignant arrhythmia, WCD can be used via an online platform as a telemonitoring system to supervise patients’ physical activity, compliance, and heart rate. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 173 patients with regard to compliance and heart rate after discharge. Results: Mean WCD wearing time was 59.75 ± 35.6 days; the daily wearing time was 21.19 ± 4.65 h. We found significant differences concerning the patients’ compliance. Men showed less compliance than women, and younger patients showed less compliance than patients who were older. Furthermore, we analyzed the heart rate from discharge until the end of WCD prescription and found a significant decrease from discharge to 4, 8, or 12 weeks. Conclusion: WCD can be used as a telemonitoring system to help the involved heart failure unit or physicians attend to and adjust the medical therapy. Furthermore, specific patient groups should be educated more intensively with respect to compliance.

The number of patients with implanted left ventricular assist devices is constantly increasing. Numerous patients suffer from drug-resistant ventricular tachycardias. Only a few studies and reports about ablation therapy in this cohort of patients are available. Electromagnetic interferences between the left ventricular assist device and the three-dimensional mapping system which is used for ablation has been described as disabling the investigator to create a proper map of the left ventricle. We observed that this interference is interrupted by "hot mapping" meaning that one pretends an ablation with only 5 W, permitting the creation of a clear map in areas of interference.

We report a safe and feasible maneuver to facilitate transseptal access with the CB steerable sheath in cases complicated by excessive interatrial resistance.

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become a cornerstone therapy in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients with overweight or obesity suffer more often from AF, and studies investigating the safety and feasibility of PVI in these patients have shown varying results. In this study we analyzed PVI performed with the 2nd generation cryoballoon (CB) with regard to safety, procedure and fluoroscopy time in patients with normal weight, overweight and obesity. We analyzed 228 consecutive patients treated with CB PVI in our hospital in 2018 and 2019. Fifty nine (25.88%) patients presented with normal weight (body mass index (BMI) of <math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="w1" alttext=" < 25), 115 (50.44%) patients with overweight (BMI between 25 and 29.9) and 54 (23.68%) were obese patients (BMI " display="inline"> > 30). All pulmonary veins (PV) were isolated successfully. Concerning procedural parameters, neither complications, procedural time, nor fluoroscopy time differed significantly. There was a significant increase of dose area product (DAP) in obese patients compared to normal weight and overweight patients (2035.5 ± 1930.1 μ Gym 2 vs. 975.3 ± 814.9 vs. 1325.1 ± 2081.3, p = 0.001) but no significant difference between overweight and normal weight patients (p = 0.611). Our follow-up data of 168 patients (73.68%) observed for 12 months showed no differences in the recurrence of AF in the three BMI groups [80.9% vs. 83.3% (p = 0.733) vs. 86.55% (p = 0.460)]. In conclusion, CB PVI in overweight and obese patients is safe with similar levels of complications and recurrence of AF as patients of normal weight. However, obese patients and operators are exposed to higher radiation doses.