There is not a clear clinical recommendation for the determination of
prosthetic candidacy. Guidelines do not delineate which member(s) of the
multidisciplinary team are responsible for prosthetic candidacy decisions and
which factors will best predict a positive outcome. Also not clearly addressed
is a patient-centered decision-making role. In a previous systematic review
(SR), Sansam et al. reported on the prediction of walking ability following
lower limb amputation using literature up to 2007. The search strategy was
designed from the previous Sansam SR as an update of previously valuable
predictive factors of prosthetic candidacy. An electronic literature search was
executed from August 8, 2007, to December 31, 2015, using MEDLINE (Pubmed),
Embase, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL)
(Ovid), and Cochrane. A total of 319 studies were identified through the
electronic search. Of these, 298 were eliminated, leaving a total of 21 for full
evaluation. Conclusions from this updated study are drawn from a total recruited
sample (n) of 15,207 subjects. A total of 12,410 subjects
completed the respective studies (18% attrition). This updated study
increases the size of the original Sansam et al. report by including
137% more subjects for a total of 21,490 between the two articles
Etiology, physical fitness, pre-amputation living status, amputation level, age,
physical fitness, and comorbidities are included as moderate to strongly
supported predictive factors of prosthetic candidacy. These factors are
supported in an earlier literature review and should be strongly considered in a
complete history and physical examination by a multidisciplinary team.
Predictive factors should be part of the patient’s healthcare
record.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.