We performed a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study to evaluate the effect of diltiazem on reinfarction after a non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Nine centers enrolled 576 patients: 287 received diltiazem (90 mg every six hours) and 289 received placebo. Treatment was initiated 24 to 72 hours after the onset of infarction and continued for up to 14 days. The primary end point, reinfarction, was defined as an abnormal reelevation of MB creatine kinase in plasma within 14 days. Reinfarction occurred in 27 patients in the placebo group (9.3 percent) and in 15 in the diltiazem group (5.2 percent)--a 51.2 percent reduction in cumulative life-table incidence (P = 0.0297; 90 percent confidence interval, 7 to 67 percent). Diltiazem reduced the frequency of refractory postinfarction angina (a secondary end point) by 49.7 percent (P = 0.0345; 90 percent confidence interval, 6 to 73 percent). Mortality was similar in the two groups (3.1 and 3.8 percent, respectively, in the placebo and diltiazem groups), but adverse drug reactions (most of which were mild) were more common in the diltiazem group. Nevertheless, the drug was well tolerated, despite concurrent treatment with beta-blockers in 61 percent of the patients. We conclude that diltiazem was effective in preventing early reinfarction and severe angina after non-Q-wave infarction and that it was also safe and generally well tolerated.
Glyceryl trinitrate was previously said to be contraindicated in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Its intravenous administration during acute infarction, however, was associated with a beneficial effect as determined by ST segment mapping. Most recently in a selected group of patients with acute infarction and abnormal haemodynamics, intravenous glyceryl trinitrate was shown to reduce infarct size estimated by enzymes. The present study was performed to verify the safety of intravenous glyceryl trinitrate in patients with infarction under conventional clinical conditions without invasive monitoring and to determine its effect on infarct size in a prospective randomised trial involving 85 patients with infarction (43 treated and 42 control). Treated patients received glyceryl trinitrate within 10 hours of the onset of symptoms (mean 6.0 hours), and the dose was titrated to preset limits for changes in heart rate and blood pressure. In patients with inferior infarction, infarct size estimated by enzymes in the treated was only 12.2 +/- 1.8 versus 19.1 +/- 3.6 CK gram equivalents per metre squared in the placebo group. A similar but statistically insignificant trend was observed for subendocardial infarction but no difference was observed for anterior infarction. Ventricular arrhythmias determined from 24 hour tapes were more frequent in treated patients though this was not statistically significant. Lignocaine requirements in treated and control (1692 +/- 250 vs 1512 +/- 232 mg/24 h) were similar, as were the requirements for morphine (11.4 +/- 1.8 vs 12.2 +/- 2.2 mg/24 h). Results indicate that intravenous glyceryl trinitrate can be administered safely during evolving infarction without invasive monitoring and reduces infarct size in patients with inferior infarction.
A total of 89 patients, age 80 years or older at the time of initial permanent pacemaker implantation, were followed for 10 to 128 months [mean 32.7]. There were 54 males and 35 females. The mean age was 84.8 years. There were 51 patients age 80-84, 25 age 85-89, and 13 age 90-94. The actuarial 5-year survival was 45%. Complications occurred in 23 patients [40 episodes]. To date, 41 patients have already required at least one pulse generator replacement and 2 patients have already required 5 replacements. All but 3 patients were symptomatic prior to pacing and 56 were asymptomatic at last follow-up. Permanent pacing in the elderly is therapeutically rewarding and not associated with excess morbidity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.