ObjectivesTo investigate the demographics and motivations of whole-body donors in China, and help suggest a solution to the problem of low body donation numbers.DesignA cross-sectional study on body donors in China. Demographic analysis of the donating information of deceased donors and in-depth interviews of potential body donors.SettingEleven districts in Nanjing, China.ParticipantsDeceased whole-body donors who had donated their bodies to the body donation receiving station of Nanjing Medical University between 1 July 2009 and 30 June 2019 (n=835), and living registered whole-body donors (n=68).ResultsAmong the whole-body donor population, the numbers of males, people older than 65 years and those working as teachers, government officials, medical staff and farmers were significantly higher than those of the general Nanjing population. Donors with an education level of college or above accounted for nearly half of the deceased donors, and considered donating their bodies earlier in their lives than others. Cancer and heart disease were the major causes of death among donors. Interviews of the 68 living donors revealed the following major motivations for the decision to donate: to support medical education; to reduce their children’s funeral burden; no longer holding traditional Chinese views on life and death; influence by role models and annoyance at complex funeral ceremonies.ConclusionsOlder people, people with an education level of college or above, labourers, teachers, government officials and farmers are the major groups that donate their bodies. Although people’s motivations for donation are complex, their desire to support medical education is the most prevalent motivation. By helping focus on target groups for promotional messaging and identifying their prime motivations, this study’s findings can provide a reference for promoting body donation in China.

Multiple body donation programs have been established throughout China over the last 20 years, but these programs remain challenged by an insufficient supply of cadavers for medical education. The commemoration of body donors is a feature of many successful programs, and adopting this practice throughout the country could be an important element of raising public awareness and encouraging body donation among the public. The present study aimed to investigate public views on the commemoration of whole‐body donors and postdonation services in China by analyzing the factors that influence participants' willingness to donate. A survey was conducted using convenience sampling with a non‐probability sampling method, and data were analyzed using chi‐square and post hoc multiple comparisons tests. A total of 1,800 questionnaires were distributed, 1,717 were returned, and 1,605 were considered valid. Of the respondents, 20.87% were willing to donate, and 64.80% thought that it is necessary to commemorate donors. The results of multiple comparisons demonstrated that the elderly and those with a higher educational level were more willing to donate than participants in other groups. Education was also found to influence views on donation memorial activities, and the chi‐square test revealed that conducting commemorations and improving postdonation services can promote the establishment of successful donor programs in China and improve the social acceptance of body donation.

Background: The tumor abnormal protein (TAP) test is used to screen for many cancers, but its use for breast cancer has not been studied. Methods: Tests for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3), and TAP were administered to 261 women with operable benign breast disease and 348 with breast cancer. The cutoff value used for TAP was the mean + 3 standard deviations for benign breast disease patients (275.64 μm 2 ). Sensitivities and specificities of single biomarker tests and combined tests were compared. The combined tests were defined as positive if any single biomarker was positive, and negative otherwise. Results: The single biomarker test sensitivities were similar: CEA, 7.18%; CA125, 4.89%; CA15-3, 7.47%; and TAP, 4.89%. For the combinations TAP + CEA + CA125, TAP + CEA + CA15-3, TAP + CA125 + CA15-3, and TAP + CEA + CA125 + CA15-3, the sensitivities were 16.67%, 17.82%, 16.38%, and 21.84%, respectively, and the specificities were 93.49%, 97.70%, 93.87%, and 92.72%. Conclusions: The 4-test combination showed the highest sensitivity (21.84%) and may be auxiliary used in early screening. TAP + CEA + CA15-3 showed high specificity (97.70%) and so could be used for confirming breast cancer.