IntroductionNon-invasive assessment of steatosis and fibrosis is of growing relevance in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). 1H-Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) and the ultrasound-based controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) correlate with biopsy proven steatosis, but have not been correlated with each other so far. We therefore performed a head-to-head comparison between both methods.MethodsFifty patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD and 15 healthy volunteers were evaluated with 1H-MRS and transient elastography (TE) including CAP. Steatosis was defined according to the percentage of affected hepatocytes: S1 5-33%, S2 34–66%, S3 ≥67%.ResultsSteatosis grade in patients with NAFLD was S1 36%, S2 40% and S3 24%. CAP and 1H-MRS significantly correlated with histopathology and showed comparable accuracy for the detection of hepatic steatosis: areas under the receiver-operating characteristics curves were 0.93 vs. 0.88 for steatosis ≥S1 and 0.94 vs. 0.88 for ≥S2, respectively. Boot-strapping analysis revealed a CAP cut-off of 300 dB/m for detection of S2-3 steatosis, while retaining the lower cut-off of 215 dB/m for the definition of healthy individuals. Direct comparison between CAP and 1H-MRS revealed only modest correlation (total cohort: r = 0.63 [0.44, 0.76]; NAFLD cases: r = 0.56 [0.32, 0.74]). For detection of F2–4 fibrosis TE had sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 98.1% at a cut-off value of 8.85 kPa.ConclusionOur data suggest a comparable diagnostic value of CAP and 1H-MRS for hepatic steatosis quantification. Combined with the simultaneous TE fibrosis assessment, CAP represents an efficient method for non-invasive characterization of NAFLD. Limited correlation between CAP and 1H-MRS may be explained by different technical aspects, anthropometry, and presence of advanced liver fibrosis.

Background Body fat and/or muscle composition influences prognosis in several cancer types. For advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer, we investigated which body composition parameters carry prognostic information beyond well‐established clinical parameters using robust model selection strategy such that parameters identified can be expected to generalize and to be reproducible beyond our particular data set. Then we modelled how differences in these parameters translate into survival outcomes. Methods Fat and muscle parameters were measured on baseline computed tomography scans in 761 patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer from the phase III EXPAND trial, undergoing first‐line chemotherapy. Cox regression analysis for overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS) included body composition parameters and clinical prognostic factors. All continuous variables were entered linearly into the model as there was no evidence of non‐linear prognostic impact. For transferability, the final model included only parameters that were picked by Bayesian information criterion model selection followed by bootstrap analysis to identify the most robust model. Results Muscle and fat parameters formed correlation clusters without relevant between‐cluster correlation. Mean muscle attenuation (MA) clusters with the fat parameters. In multivariate analysis, MA was prognostic for OS (P < 0.0001) but not for PFS, while skeletal muscle index was prognostic for PFS (P = 0.02) but not for OS. Worse performance status Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG 1/0), younger age (on a linear scale), and the number of metastatic sites were strong negative clinical prognostic factors for both OS and PFS. MA remained in the model for OS (P = 0.0001) following Bayesian information criterion model selection in contrast to skeletal muscle index that remained prognostic for PFS (P = 0.009). Applying stricter criteria for transferability, MA represented the only prognostic body composition parameter for OS, selected in >80% of bootstrap replicates. Finally, Cox model‐derived survival curves indicated that large differences in MA translate into only moderate differences in expected OS in this cohort. Conclusions Among body composition parameters, only MA has robust prognostic impact for OS. Data suggest that treatment approaches targeting muscle quality are unlikely to prolong OS noticeably on their own in advanced gastric cancer patients, indicating that multimodal approaches should be pursued in the future.

• Absolute ADC values are highly dependent on the choice of b values. • Absolute ADC thresholds should be used carefully to predict tumour aggressiveness. • Subjective ratings of ADC maps involving b = 0 s/mm ( 2 ) are poor to fair. • Minimum b value greater than 0 s/mm ( 2 ) is recommended for ADC calculation.

The quantification of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is increasingly being considered for risk assessment and treatment monitoring in obese patients, but is generally time-consuming. The goals of this work were to semi-automatically segment and quantify VAT areas of MRI slices at previously proposed anatomical landmarks and to evaluate their predictive power for whole-abdominal VAT volumes on a relatively large number of patients. One-hundred and ninety-seven overweight to severely obese patients (65 males; body mass index, 33.3 ± 3.5 kg/m(2); 132 females; body mass index, 34.3 ± 3.2 kg/m(2)) underwent MRI examination. Total VAT volumes (VVAT-T ) of the abdominopelvic cavity were quantified by retrospective analysis of two-point Dixon MRI data (active-contour segmentation, visual correction and histogram analysis). VVAT-T was then compared with VAT areas determined on one or five slices defined at seven anatomical landmarks (lumbar intervertebral spaces, umbilicus and femoral heads) and corresponding conversion factors were determined. Statistical measures were the coefficients of variation and standard deviations σ1 and σ5 of the difference between predicted and measured VAT volumes (Bland-Altman analysis). VVAT-T was 6.0 ± 2.0 L (2.5-11.2 L) for males and 3.2 ± 1.4 L (0.9-7.7 L) for females. The analysis of five slices yielded a better agreement than the analysis of single slices, required only a little extra time (4 min versus 2 min) and was substantially faster than whole-abdominal assessment (24 min). Best agreements were found at intervertebral spaces L3-L4 for females (σ5/1 = 523/608 mL) and L2-L3 for males (σ5/1 = 613/706 mL). Five-slice VAT volume estimates at the level of lumbar disc L3-L4 for females and L2-L3 for males can be obtained within 4 min and were a reliable predictor for abdominopelvic VAT volume in overweight to severely adipose patients. One-slice estimates took only 2 min and were slightly less accurate. These findings may contribute to the implementation of analytical methods for fast and reliable (routine) estimation of VAT volumes in obese patients.