No abstract

The feasibility of the production of a reference material for pesticide residue analysis in a cucumber matrix was investigated. Cucumber was spiked at 0.075 mg/kg with each of the 15 selected pesticides (acetamiprid, azoxystrobin, carbendazim, chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, diazinon, (α + β)-endosulfan, fenitrothion, imazalil, imidacloprid, iprodione, malathion, methomyl, tebuconazole and thiabendazole) respectively. Three different strategies were considered for processing the material, based on the physicochemical properties of the vegetable and the target pesticides. As a result, a frozen spiked slurry of fresh cucumber, a spiked freeze-dried cucumber powder and a freeze-dried cucumber powder spiked by spraying the powder were studied. The effects of processing and aspects related to the reconstitution of the material were evaluated by monitoring the pesticide levels in the three materials. Two separate analytical methods based on LC–MS/MS and GC–MS/MS were developed and validated in-house. The spiked freeze-dried cucumber powder was selected as the most feasible material and more exhaustive studies on homogeneity and stability of the pesticide residues in the matrix were carried out. The results suggested that the between-unit homogeneity was satisfactory with a sample intake of dried material as low as 0.1 g. A 9-week isochronous stability study was undertaken at −20 °C, 4 °C and 18 °C, with −70 °C designated as the reference temperature. The pesticides tested exhibited adequate stability at −20 °C during the 9-week period as well as at −70 °C for a period of 18 months. These results constitute a good basis for the development of a new candidate reference material for selected pesticides in a cucumber matrix.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00216-015-8476-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract

The mycotoxin aflatoxin M1 (AfM1) is a serious food safety hazard for which the European Commission has already established a maximum permissible level of 0.05 μg/kg AfM1 in milk and products thereof. For control analysis laboratories are increasingly asked to submit full uncertainties of their analytical results.The evaluation of measurement uncertainties of an analytical method for the determination of AfM1 in milk and milk powder on the basis of 'in-house' validation data in compliance with the 'Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM)' [1] and the 'EURACHEM Guide' [2] is described. A similar approach will be used to assess the performance of methods employed by laboratories participating in the certification of reference materials for AfM1 in milk powder.

During the Belgian PCB crisis (1999/2000) the quality of the data from the PCB monitoring were studied with a proficiency testing experiment. Pork fat that was spiked at the Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements (EC-JRC-IRMM) was sent out as unknown to all laboratories that participated in the monitoring. In parallel, the material was certified on the basis of the results of several leading PCB laboratories throughout Europe that did not participate in the monitoring. During the first round 15 to 25% deviation was experienced, while in the end of this multistep intercalibration procedure the average deviation for the respective PCBs was 10.9% (PCB 28), 13.1% (PCB 52), 10.1% (PCB 101), 10.7% (PCB 118), 10.7% (PCB 138), 9.1% (PCB 153), 8.1% (PCB 180) and 8.2% for the sum of the 7 PCBs. The concentrations measured for the higher volatile PCB 28 had a tendency to show lower levels, while for PCB 180 this was less pronounced. On the other hand, PCB 153 showed results rather to the higher side. During this exercise the material was also tested for stability by one of the certifying laboratories.