The relationship between a large molecular weight (9S) and a small molecular weight (4.5S, 60,000 molecular weight) species of phytochrome was examined to determine if the larger species was an aggregate of the smaller. Alterations of pH, salt concentration, or phytochrome concentration did not cause any observable formation of the large form from the small form. However, in partially purified phytochrome extracts from Secale cereale L. and Avena sativa L., the large form was converted to the small form over time at 4 C in the dark. This breakdown was inhibitable by the protease inhibitor phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride. When highly purified large molecular weight rye phytochrome was incubated with a neutral protease isolated from etiolated oat shoots, the large phytochrome was converted to the small form without qualitative visible absorbancy changes. The effect of the oat protease could be mimicked by a wide variety of commercial endopeptidases, including trypsin. Examination of the trypsin-induced breakdown on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed that as the size of the photoreversible unit changes from large to small, the size of its constituent polypeptide chains is reduced from 120,000 to 62,000 molecular weight. These experiments provide evidence that the endogenous breakdown observed in extracts is a result of contaminant protease and, consequently, that the small molecular weight species of phytochrome is an artifact due to proteolysis.Since the early work of Siegelman and Firer (41)

No abstract

No abstract

Yields of 5 to 10% (7.5-10 milligrams) of phytochrome in crude extract were obtained from 10-to 12-kilogram seedling lots. The purified rye phytochrome had an absorbance ratio of 1.25 to 1.37, significantly lower than values in the literature and gave a single major band with an estimated molecular weight of 120,000 on electrophoresis in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. It is suggested that the absorbance ratio and electrophoretic behavior of rye phytochrome are indices of purified native phytochrome, and that oat phytochrome as it has been described is an artifact which arises as a result of endogenous proteolysis during isolation. A rationale is provided for further modifications of the purification procedure to alleviate presumed protease contaminants.

No abstract