No abstract

We tested the accuracy of 2 parent-report tools, the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC-35) and Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), to identify attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and distinguish complex (highly comorbid) cases in an urban, largely Latino pediatric practice. Spanish- and English-speaking parents of children aged 6 to 10 years completed a PSC-35 and CBCL at well visits. Those with CBCL Attention Problems Subscale (CBCL-APS) T scores ≥60 plus controls completed the diagnostic MINI-KID (Miniature International Neuropsychiatric Interview) for Children. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves quantified accuracy of both scales to distinguish ADHD from non-ADHD, and complex from simple ADHD. Two hundred and nine children were screened, and 41 completed diagnostic interviews. Both the CBCL-APS and PSC Attention Scale (PSC-AS) accurately identified ADHD; the CBCL-APS performed best (AUROC = 0.837; AUROC = 0.728). The PSC Total and Internalizing Scores and the number of CBCL subscale elevations accurately distinguished complex from simple ADHD; the PSC Internalizing Score performed best (AUROC = 0.700; AUROC = 0.817; AUROC = 0.762).

Using questionnaires, administrative claims, and chart review data, the current study explored the impact of using an electronic medical record system to administer, score, and store the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC-17) during annual pediatric well-child visits. Within a sample of 1773 Medicaid-insured outpatients, the electronic system demonstrated that 90.5% of cases completed a PSC-17 screen electronically, billing codes indicating a screen was administered agreed with the existence of a questionnaire in the chart in 98.8% of cases, the classification of risk based on PSC-17 scores agreed with the classification of risk based on the Current Procedural Terminology code modifiers in 72.9% of cases, and 90.0% of clinicians’ progress notes mentioned PSC-17 score in treatment planning. Using an electronic approach to psychosocial screening in pediatrics facilitated the use of screening information gathered during the clinical visit and allowed for enhanced tracking of outcomes and quality monitoring.