No abstract

BackgroundWith the increasing frequency of tunneled hemodialysis catheter use there is a parallel increase in the need for removal and/or exchange. A small but significant minority of catheters become embedded or ‘stuck’ and cannot be removed by traditional means. Management of embedded catheters involves cutting the catheter, burying the retained fragment with a subsequent increased risk of infections and thrombosis. Endoluminal dilatation may provide a potential safe and effective technique for removing embedded catheters, however, to date, there is a paucity of data.Objectives1) To determine factors associated with catheters becoming embedded and 2) to determine outcomes associated with endoluminal dilatationMethodsAll patients with endoluminal dilatation for embedded catheters at our institution since Jan. 2010 were included. Patients who had an embedded catheter were matched 1:3 with patients with uncomplicated catheter removal. Baseline patient and catheter characteristics were compared. Outcomes included procedural success and procedure-related infection. Logistic regression models were used to determine factors associated with embedded catheters.ResultsWe matched 15 cases of embedded tunneled catheters with 45 controls. Among patients with embedded catheters, there were no complications with endoluminal dilatation. Factors independently associated with embedded catheters included catheter dwell time (> 2 years) and history of central venous stenosis.ConclusionEmbedded catheters can be successfully managed by endoluminal dilatation with minimal complications and factors associated with embedding include dwell times > 2 years and/or with a history of central venous stenosis.

<b><i>Background:</i></b> It is important for medical practitioners to be aware of the effect of iodinated contrast media on the residual renal function (RRF) of dialysis patients who require diagnostic or therapeutic imaging procedures. Preservation of RRF is important given that it is a robust predictor of higher survival. However, the absence of any effect would allow for easier diagnostic or therapeutic imaging tests to be performed. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> This systematic review with meta-analysis will quantify the effect of intravascular administration of iodinated contrast on the residual function of adult dialysis patients. <b><i>Study Design:</i></b> The selection criteria included adult (age ≥ 18 years) populations undergoing dialysis, who have been administered an intravascular contrast. The primary outcome was the measurement of residual function. Secondary outcomes were disease progression from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis, hospitalization following contrast administration, and all-cause mortality. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Nine studies including 434 patients met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was performed on 7 trials with complete quantitative data. The weighted difference in means was −0.16 mL/min (95% confidence interval −0.66 to 0.34 mL/min; <i>p</i> = 0.53), suggesting a small reduction in residual function following contrast administration. Significant heterogeneity in the data was observed, with a Cochran <i>Q</i> of 35.83 and an <i>I</i>² of 83.25 (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.0001). Subgroup analysis of retrospective versus prospective study design resolved heterogeneity. Few data were reported for clinical outcomes. <b><i>Limitations:</i></b> Small sample size of included studies. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Intravascularly administered contrast media may not result in a significant reduction of residual function in dialysis patients.

Burkholderia cepacia is a ubiquitous, opportunistic, environmental gram-negative bacillus which most commonly affects cystic fibrosis and immunocompromised patients. Rarely, it can cause peritoneal dialysis (PD) exit-site infection (ESI). Information relating to predisposing factors, clinical course, and treatment options for B. cepacia ESIs is limited. Although reports of B. cepacia healthcare-associated infections exist, outbreaks in PD units have not previously been reported. A recent outbreak of B. cepacia ESI in our PD unit provided a unique opportunity to study B. cepacia ESIs and to outline an approach to investigating such an outbreak. After unexpectedly identifying B. cepacia as the cause of PD catheter ESIs in 3 patients over an 11-week period, we began systematically screening our PD population for B. cepacia exit-site colonization. A further 6 patients were found to be affected, 3 with asymptomatic colonization and 3 with symptomatic B. cepacia ESI. Four of the 6 developed tunnel infections requiring multiple courses of antibiotic treatment, and 3 patients required catheter removal; 2 patients with symptomatic ESIs without tunnel involvement responded to oral and topical antibiotics. Further investigation implicated 4% chlorhexidine aqueous bodywash used by all patients as the probable source of the outbreak. This is the first reported outbreak of B. cepacia ESIs. We noted an association between diabetes mellitus and refractory/more extensive infection. Our experience suggests that isolated ESIs can be treated successfully with oral antibiotics whereas tunnel infections generally require catheter removal.

Hypertension remains an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. It both contributes to and is a consequence of chronic renal dysfunction. There is a high prevalence of hypertension in chronic kidney disease, and rates of control remain sub-optimal. Numerous studies have highlighted the benefit of treating hypertension in reducing the overall mortality as well as progression of renal disease in this population. Non-pharmacologic treatment strategies remain the primary intervention in all patients but are insufficient on their own to control hypertension in most cases. Pharmacologic treatment recommendations, however, vary depending on the specific etiology of disease as well as patient characteristics. Though most classes of anti-hypertensive drugs can be used to lower blood pressure in chronic kidney disease, therapy needs to be selected based on the presence of specific co-morbidities as well as the etiology of the kidney disease. Most patients will require multi-drug therapy for achieving target blood pressure goals. This review discusses the pharmacologic options in management of hypertension in various forms of chronic kidney disease.