Adrenal incidentalomas are adrenal masses discovered incidental to imaging studies performed for reasons unrelated to adrenal pathology. Although most adrenal incidentalomas are non-functioning benign adenomas, their increasing prevalence presents diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. The assessment of adrenal incidentalomas is aimed at deciding whether or not the tumour should be surgically removed. Adrenalectomy is indicated for phaeochromocytoma, other symptomatic hormone-secreting tumours and those with a high risk of malignancy. Biochemical screening for tumour hypersecretion is mandatory in all adrenal incidentalomas, since hormone secreting tumours may be clinically silent. The diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma is of paramount importance because of its life-threatening complications. Non-functioning adrenal incidentalomas need assessment for risk of malignancy, and this is based on the size of the tumour and its imaging characteristics. An observational policy with periodic radiological and biochemical reassessment is pursued in patients with non-functioning incidentalomas with low malignancy risk. The duration and frequency of reassessment remains unclear, as the natural history of adrenal incidentalomas has yet to be clearly defined, and there is a lack of controlled studies comparing surgical intervention with observation. However, the possibility of acquiring autonomous hypersecretion or conversion to malignancy in an incidentaloma diagnosed to be a benign non-functioning lesion is very low, and most patients may be safely discharged after an initial follow-up period of 2 years.

Biophysical test of endothelial function (FMD) improved after 12 months of GH therapy but there was no significant change in biochemical endothelial or inflammatory markers. Calculated coronary risk decreased mainly due to reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and increase in HDL-cholesterol.

No abstract

Objective: We assessed the commutativity of Roche and Abbott thyroid assays in the diagnosis and management of subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH). The Roche and Abbott thyroid assays are used by approximately 75% of clinical laboratories in the UK.Method: Consecutive samples received from primary care on patients with SCH who had a raised thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) <10 mIU/L and a normal free thyroxine (fT4) from two laboratories using either Roche or Abbott thyroid assays were identified over 10 working days. Following identification, samples were analysed at the other site within 24 hours. Diagnostic and management discordance were studied using the relevant manufacturer-provided reference ranges. Results:We identified 93 patients with SCH (53 using the Roche assay). Roche TSH and fT4 results were respectively 40% ± 15% and 16% ± 7% higher (P < .001) compared to Abbott results. Of the 93 patients, 41 (44%) were concordant for SCH on both methods. Of the 53 patients with SCH on the Roche assays, 40 (75.5%) had normal thyroid function and 13 (24.5%) had SCH when analysed using the Abbott assays. Of the 40 patients with SCH on the Abbott assays, 28 (70%) had SCH and 12 (30%) had results indicative for levothyroxine replacement when analysed on the Roche assays. Of these 12 patients, four had TSH > 10 mIU/L, five had low fT4 and three had both. Conclusion:The diagnosis and management of SCH is strikingly different when using TSH and fT4 assays provided by Abbott Laboratories and Roche Diagnostics.Clinicians and laboratorians should be aware that between-assay differences and variations in reference ranges will directly impact the diagnosis and management of subclinical hypothyroidism.

Background: To establish cutoff values for salivary liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy cortisol and cortisone in defining adequate adrenocortical function during a standard synacthen test. Methods: We compared salivary liquid chromatography tandem mass spectroscopy cortisol and cortisone responses to those of serum cortisol measured on the Roche E170 immunoassay analyser and the Abbott Architect i2000 before and 30 min and 60 min following 0.25 mg of intravenous synacthen. Results: Correlations of salivary cortisol and cortisone were bimodal and linear, respectively. Based on these correlations, adequate salivary cortisol and cortisone responses to synacthen were extrapolated from a serum cortisol (Roche) cut-off of 550 nmol/L and defined as 15 nmol/L and 45 nmol/L, respectively. The Abbott method correlated well with the Roche but gave results that were about 20% lower than the Roche method. Conclusions: Measurement of salivary cortisol and cortisone responses offers an alternative to those of serum cortisol during a synacthen test in the investigation of adrenal hypofunction.