The efficacy of convalescent plasma for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear. Although most randomized controlled trials have shown negative results, uncontrolled studies have suggested that the antibody content could influence patient outcomes. We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled trial of convalescent plasma for adults with COVID-19 receiving oxygen within 12 d of respiratory symptom onset (NCT04348656). Patients were allocated 2:1 to 500 ml of convalescent plasma or standard of care. The composite primary outcome was intubation or death by 30 d. Exploratory analyses of the effect of convalescent plasma antibodies on the primary outcome was assessed by logistic regression. The trial was terminated at 78% of planned enrollment after meeting stopping criteria for futility. In total, 940 patients were randomized, and 921 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Intubation or death occurred in 199/614 (32.4%) patients in the convalescent plasma arm and 86/307 (28.0%) patients in the standard of care arm—relative risk (RR) = 1.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94–1.43, P = 0.18). Patients in the convalescent plasma arm had more serious adverse events (33.4% versus 26.4%; RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.02–1.57, P = 0.034). The antibody content significantly modulated the therapeutic effect of convalescent plasma. In multivariate analysis, each standardized log increase in neutralization or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity independently reduced the potential harmful effect of plasma (odds ratio (OR) = 0.74, 95% CI 0.57–0.95 and OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.87, respectively), whereas IgG against the full transmembrane spike protein increased it (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.14–2.05). Convalescent plasma did not reduce the risk of intubation or death at 30 d in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Transfusion of convalescent plasma with unfavorable antibody profiles could be associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to standard care.

Researchers have only begun to turn their attention to the role of self-control in communal action (rather than communal restraint) in relationships. Conflicting results from early studies indicate that the association between self-control and communal action may be quite complex, and potentially moderated by many variables. Here we investigate how relationship length may moderate the extent to which communal actions require self-control resources. In 5 studies, we investigated the role of self-control resources in implementing (Studies 1 and 2) and in choosing (Studies 3-5) communal actions for a romantic partner, as a function of the length of time partners had been together. The data supported the hypothesis that as relationships mature over time, communal actions may require less self-control to implement and may become a decisional default. These findings suggest that communal actions may be a more deliberative response in newer romantic relationships but a more reflexive response in more established relationships.

Background: The purpose of this case series is to assess the safety and efficacy, as well as the overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) treated with percutaneous ablation, transarterial arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or a combination of both at our institution.Methods: Ten patients with pathological diagnosis of adenocarcinoma treated at out institution between January 1 st 2013 and January 1 st 2019 were reviewed. Three patients received a combined TACE and ablation treatment, three patients received TACE without ablation and four patients were treated with ablation only.Ablation technical success was determined by absence of residual tumor in the ablation zone on follow-up imaging one-month post-ablation. TACE response was assessed using the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Technical success was defined as injection of chemoembolic material in the involved liver lobes. PFS and OS were calculated from the date of diagnosis.Results: In the TACE and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) group, OS was 12, 55 and 56 months; PFS was 5, 6 and 32 months, one patient died and two others remain alive. In the TACE group, OS was 29, 10 and 5 months; PFS was 15, 10 and 4 months. All three patients remain alive. In the ablation group, OS and PFS were 16, 31, 30 and 40 months. All patients remain alive. Overall, 9 of 10 patients are alive, with a Median OS and PFS of 29.5 and 15.5 months, respectively, with some patients remain alive over four years following initial presentation. Conclusions:Our study shows that ablation and TACE in combination with more traditional modalities such as chemoradiation and surgical resection can extend survival in patients with ICC significantly.Locoregional therapy is well tolerated with only minor adverse events. The use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with ablation demonstrated the synergistic nature of using multiple lines of interventions.

No abstract