The hemodynamic and cardiac metabolic effects of increasing central aortic pressure by obstructing the abdominal aorta with a balloon catheter introduced via a femoral artery were determined in 28 anesthetized dogs with acute myocardial infarction and shock produced by coronary embolization with plastic spheres. Following coronary embolization, aortic pressure, cardiac output, and left ventricular mechanical efficiency declined in all animals; left ventricular "excess lactate" appeared in about one-half. With abdominal aortic obstruction for 1 hour, there were significant elevations of postembolic aortic pressure, coronary flow, cardiac output, left ventricular oxygen consumption and mechanical efficiency. Left atrial pressure rose slightly but not beyond normal limits. Arterial-coronary sinus oxygen difference diminished, and left ventricular excess lactate diminished or disappeared in 60% of the animals in which it was noted in the postembolic state. After 1 hour of abdominal aortic obstruction, cardiac output, central aortic pressure, and coronary flow diminished moderately. It is concluded that mechanical increase of vascular resistance for periods up to 1 hour may improve myocardial performance in acute myocardial infarction with shock. The increased left ventricular oxygen needs are met adequately by the increase of coronary flow associated with the increase of perfusion pressure. ADDITIONAL KEY WORDS coronary flow myocardial metabolism cardiac output myocardial lactate dogs circulatory support aortic pressure by guest on June 15, 2015 http://circres.ahajournals.org/ Downloaded from > c .JO JO m v> H Z o m -X "O m 70 m Z 2 o 70 Z > JO q o Mean values with standard error in parentheses. •Change from postembolic level obtained prior to balloon inflation: P < 0.05. fMean weight = 23.1 (±1.1) kg. 00 by guest on June 15, 2015
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.