Proteomics data are often plagued with missingness issues. These missing values (MVs) threaten the integrity of subsequent statistical analyses by reduction of statistical power, introduction of bias, and failure to represent the true sample. Over the years, several categories of missing value imputation (MVI) methods have been developed and adapted for proteomics data. These MVI methods perform their tasks based on different prior assumptions (e.g., data is normally or independently distributed) and operating principles (e.g., the algorithm is built to address random missingness only), resulting in varying levels of performance even when dealing with the same dataset. Thus, to achieve a satisfactory outcome, a suitable MVI method must be selected. To guide decision making on suitable MVI method, we provide a decision chart which facilitates strategic considerations on datasets presenting different characteristics. We also bring attention to other issues that can impact proper MVI such as the presence of confounders (e.g., batch effects) which can influence MVI performance. Thus, these too, should be considered during or before MVI.

Missing values (MVs) can adversely impact data analysis and machine-learning model development. We propose a novel mixed-model method for missing value imputation (MVI). This method, ProJect (short for Protein inJection), is a powerful and meaningful improvement over existing MVI methods such as Bayesian principal component analysis (PCA), probabilistic PCA, local least squares and quantile regression imputation of left-censored data. We rigorously tested ProJect on various high-throughput data types, including genomics and mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics. Specifically, we utilized renal cancer (RC) data acquired using DIA-SWATH, ovarian cancer (OC) data acquired using DIA-MS, bladder (BladderBatch) and glioblastoma (GBM) microarray gene expression dataset. Our results demonstrate that ProJect consistently performs better than other referenced MVI methods. It achieves the lowest normalized root mean square error (on average, scoring 45.92% less error in RC_C, 27.37% in RC_full, 29.22% in OC, 23.65% in BladderBatch and 20.20% in GBM relative to the closest competing method) and the Procrustes sum of squared error (Procrustes SS) (exhibits 79.71% less error in RC_C, 38.36% in RC full, 18.13% in OC, 74.74% in BladderBatch and 30.79% in GBM compared to the next best method). ProJect also leads with the highest correlation coefficient among all types of MV combinations (0.64% higher in RC_C, 0.24% in RC full, 0.55% in OC, 0.39% in BladderBatch and 0.27% in GBM versus the second-best performing method). ProJect’s key strength is its ability to handle different types of MVs commonly found in real-world data. Unlike most MVI methods that are designed to handle only one type of MV, ProJect employs a decision-making algorithm that first determines if an MV is missing at random or missing not at random. It then employs targeted imputation strategies for each MV type, resulting in more accurate and reliable imputation outcomes. An R implementation of ProJect is available at https://github.com/miaomiao6606/ProJect.

Data analysis is complex due to a myriad of technical problems. Amongst these, missing values and batch effects are endemic. Although many methods have been developed for missing value imputation (MVI) and batch correction respectively, no study has directly considered the confounding impact of MVI on downstream batch correction. This is surprising as missing values are imputed during early pre-processing while batch effects are mitigated during late pre-processing, prior to functional analysis. Unless actively managed, MVI approaches generally ignore the batch covariate, with unknown consequences. We examine this problem by modelling three simple imputation strategies: global (M1), self-batch (M2) and cross-batch (M3) first via simulations, and then corroborated on real proteomics and genomics data. We report that explicit consideration of batch covariates (M2) is important for good outcomes, resulting in enhanced batch correction and lower statistical errors. However, M1 and M3 are error-generating: global and cross-batch averaging may result in batch-effect dilution, with concomitant and irreversible increase in intra-sample noise. This noise is unremovable via batch correction algorithms and produces false positives and negatives. Hence, careless imputation in the presence of non-negligible covariates such as batch effects should be avoided.

Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a growing problem that is projected to cause more deaths than cancer in 2050. Consequently, novel antibiotics are urgently needed. Since more than half of the available antibiotics target the bacterial ribosomes, proteins that are involved in protein synthesis are thus prime targets for the development of novel antibiotics. However, experimental identification of these potential antibiotic target proteins can be labor-intensive and challenging, as these proteins are likely to be poorly characterized and specific to few bacteria. In order to identify these novel proteins, we established a Large-Scale Transcriptomic Analysis Pipeline in Crowd (LSTrAP-Crowd), where 285 individuals processed 26 terabytes of RNA-sequencing data of the 17 most notorious bacterial pathogens. In total, the crowd processed 26,269 RNA-seq experiments and used the data to construct gene co-expression networks, which were used to identify more than a hundred uncharacterized genes that were transcriptionally associated with protein synthesis. We provide the identity of these genes together with the processed gene expression data. The data can be used to identify other vulnerabilities or bacteria, while our approach demonstrates how the processing of gene expression data can be easily crowdsourced.

Statistical analyses in high-dimensional omics data are often hampered by the presence of batch effects (BEs) and missing values (MVs), but the interaction between these two issues is not well-studied nor understood. MVs may manifest as a BE when their proportions differ across batches. These are termed as Batch-Effect Associated Missing values (BEAMs). We hypothesized that BEAMs in data may introduce bias which can impede the performance of missing value imputation (MVI). To test this, we simulated data with two batches, then introduced over 100 iterations, either 20% and 40% MVs in each batch (BEAMs) or 30% in both (control). K-nearest neighbours (KNN) was then used to perform MVI, in a typical global approach (M1) and a supposed superior batch-sensitized approach (M2). BEs were then corrected using ComBat. The effectiveness of the MVI was evaluated by its imputation accuracy and true and false positive rates. Notably, when BEAMs existed, M2 was generally undesirable as the differing application of MV filtering in M1 and M2 strategies resulted in an overall coverage deficiency. Additionally, both M1 and M2 strategies suffered in the presence of BEAMs, highlighting the need for a novel approach to handle MVI in data with BEAMs.